The Leader in Pro Bass Fishing News!
Facebook Twitter

Bassfan Feedback

All Topics   March 2015
  • George Kramer of Lake Elsinore, CA writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – Could just about everyone be a little more careful with their catch? Sure. But I see some dangerous winds blowing around the issue.

    We've done the whole net, no-net thing in the name of fish care. So then we bounce ‘em, lip ‘em, laydown lift ‘em and yet every method has a critic. Still we cheer like children when "our" pro sacks 'em good, knowing full well, some of those fish may have carpet burns.

    Getting them in the boat is the entire crux of bass fishing – it’s not birdwatching. Landing them determines who gets paid and who doesn't, but even recreationally, getting a jaw grip is why we bought the boat and the tackle.

    As for calling attention to someone else’s mishandling, I'm thinking the old counsel, "Praise in public; criticize in private" would be the better course. And not because we might shame some celebrity, but rather, such publicity endangers the sport.

    Because you know who else wants pristine fish handling? PETA, Friends of Animals and half a dozen other groups of that ilk. And their idea of proper fish-handling is to stop fishing altogether. We shouldn't be helping them with their agenda.

  • John Smith of Bangor, ME writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – Maybe if he wasn't texting while driving he would have actually seen the object and avoided it. The driver's statement is very clear: "I didn't even look up."

    BassFan says: It was the marshal who was texting – not the driver.

  • Tom Bohrer of Pleasant Plains, IL writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – I am so glad they are all right, but what really bothers me is their vests did not inflate. I hope FLW investigates not only the boat, but also why neither of the vests inflated.

  • Joseph Love of Annapolis, MD writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – Capt. Steve Chaconas wrote an impassioned response to the problem of undue handling stress on bass by professional anglers. Reducing handling stress is one of the continuing goals of largemouth bass population management (as emphasized recently by Julie Claussen in Black Bass Diversity: Multidisiplinary Science for Conservation). To continue progress toward that goal, organizations such as B.A.S.S. are working with resource agencies across the country to minimize angling stress on bass and conserve populations of bass for future anglers. Such collaborations infuse the latest scientific results into updates of classic guides such as Keeping Bass Alive and suggestions from resource agencies to anglers. Encouraging anglers to consider these results when handling fish can be a challenge, particularly when existing avenues for outreach are insufficient or ineffective.

    As Chaconas noted, exposing multiple largemouth bass simultaneously to the air by laying them on the carpet of a boat can be a problem. Exposure to air can lead to respiratory stress, drying or loss of the mucus coat, and ultimately to bacterial infections, disease, and more severely, to death. Several studies across the country have demonstrated that even though fish swim away alive, more can die once they are released than at the scales. The fish that die at the scales are often those from anglers who have malfunctioning live wells or have not provided good water exchanges, good water temperatures and recirculation.

    The tough fish that die after they are released are typically those that suffer delayed mortality and have been stressed by the livewell and handled inappropriately during the tournament. A goal of managing bass populations has been to lower delayed mortality by researching the best ways to handle bass while they are in the care of the angler. Anglers will help reduce delayed mortality of otherwise tough fish by significantly minimizing the time the fish is exposed to air and the time the fish is handled by human hands. Additional information on reducing delayed mortality and conserving populations of bass for other anglers can be found at: http://dnr2.maryland.gov/fisheries/Pages/bass/ta.aspx.

    A stressed bass may not die, of course. Delayed mortality depends on size of the fish, season of fishing and pre-existing conditions of both the bass and the water. In my experience, more larger bass typically die from oxygen deprivation than smaller (12- to 14-inch) bass. Bass that are caught and released during summer are also more likely to die from stress than those caught during early spring.

    A common pre-existing condition is the occurrence of Largemouth Bass Virus (LMBV). Bass with LMBV may be more likely to die during summer and from handling stress than bass without LMBV. Moreover, bass released into waters that have greater bacterial or pathogen loads may be more likely to experience disease when their mucus coat is damaged. Few anglers will turn down a big fish, nor can they control tournament schedules throughout the year. Therefore, catch-and-release anglers routinely face two problems when fishing: 1) not knowing the history of the fish they caught, or the waterway that fish will be released to; and 2) stigma from other anglers who, in their own experiences, understand that some fish-handling practices subject the fish to unnecessary risks.

    In my opinion, anglers should minimize risks associated with handling stress by staying current with the latest scientific information and consider that they are being watched by a diverse constituency in a sport that does not penalize players as other sports do, yet still relies on sponsorship and support from the general public.

  • Bill Spindler of Turnersville, NJ writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – I had a similar loss of boat control issue on the Delaware River years ago when a board lodged between the transom and the motor. The rear end of my bass boat started going sideways, and I was able to get it shut down before losing control of the boat. It was like hitting a sudden patch of ice with your car. Scary stuff.

  • Ken Bragg of Fayetteville, WV writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – There needs to be a thorough investigation into the reason why these inflatables did not go off. These Mustangs cost about $300 and if the inflation mechanism was showing green or active, then there is a real problem here. I certainly do not trust mine now and it really makes me wonder if this is the real reason we see so many of the pros using the old type.

  • Dave Hadley of Chestnut Ridge, NY writes:

    RE: Cox accident – It is troubling that both riders' PFDs did not inflate in this accident. Two different brands, same problem. Are inflatables safe? Maybe I shouldn't be betting my life on it.

  • Bob Ellis of Apopka, FL writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – John, glad you're okay. I had an incident as a passenger and we split the hull. I wouldn't get in a boat for 8 years it was not any fun and gives you a healthy respect for how fast things can happen.

  • Clint Yilek of Albuquerque, NM writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – I'm glad to hear they are OK. I'm a little confused as to why the boat was still running – did the kill switch fail, too? What brand of life vest were they wearing? Was it manual-inflate only?

  • Donald Muir of Nottingham, MD writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – Like to know what PFDs they were wearing and why they did not deploy. And is there going to be any testing on these PFDs? I wear a Mustang PFD and I will trash it if this is the case.

  • W. Drawbaugh of Newville, PA writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – The idea of swinging bass into the boat and bouncing around on the deck is contrary to everything I have ever learned about handling bass. Most of the time that carpet is hot and dry.

  • Mark Richards of Houston, TX writes:

    RE: Cox accident – For years, I have wondered why the USCG would ever approve an inflatable PFD. Sure, standard lifejackets are bulky, they are hot and fisherman don't want to take them on an off. But ask yourself this: If you have a boating accident, do you want to depend on a mechanism that you seldom check or can check to work? I work in the marine industry and I surely don't. In this case Cox said they might have been lucky their lifejackets didn't work. Maybe, but I would offer that most people in such circumstances quite possibly would have lost their lives under similar circumstances had their jackets not functioned properly.

    I don't begrudge the use of inflatable PFDs while people are fishing and not running the big motor because the benefit of wearing the unit full-time probably outweighs the negatives. But take it from a full-time mariner – if you value your life or the lives of anyone in your boat, a standard PFD is always the best choice. It will work when you need it to and you don't have to worry about it.

  • Al Perry of Lafayette, LA writes:

    RE: Cox accident – What a horrible experience ... very fortunate it was not any worse than that.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson,TN. writes:

    RE: Cox accident – PFD's that do not work should not be allowed in use. If the kill switch had also failed or not been hooked up, these anglers would have been in big trouble. Ten-foot water means you must swim and winter clothing will always prevent that.

    I know what Cox was thinking as I was thrown from a boat once. As I was sinking, waiting on the PFD to bring me back up, all I could think about was, where will the boat be when I surface? The driver had the kill switch hooked up and when I surfaced I was looking at the front of the boat 20 feet away.

    The PFD and kill-switch rule should never be taken lightly. They are there to save lives.

  • Jason Houchins of Clarksville, VA writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – I agree that maybe it wasn't the best way to handle fish, but I question the motives of Capt. Steve. I think maybe this was more about getting attention to your column vs. fish care. Just an opinion.

  • Mike Robinson of DeLand, FL writes:

    RE: Cox accident – This is the exact reason anglers shouldn't be forced to use provided boats. To me, John has a serious lawsuit against both FLW and Ranger Boats ... especially if it is proved to be faulty equipment! Our prayers are with you and your girls, John.

  • Tom Cox of Canton, GA writes:

    RE: Cox accident – First, good to see that both anglers were okay and nothing more serious happened. I have a couple of questions: 1) "when the boat went over them" - was the engine still running? Did he have the kill switch attached? and 2) "neither inflatable PDF went off" - worked out okay this time ... are the inflatable PDFs safe to use when operating a bass boat? Personally, I've been thinking about going back to the orange Type II. Scary accident and I'm happy both are okay.

  • Paul Wallace of Cambridge City, IN writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – The "pro" should have told Steve, "My client and I kept the bass to eat." End of discussion.

  • Ronald Fithen Sr. of Rayland, OH writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – Thanks be to God these men survived this terrible accident. Things happen and sometimes really fast, as in this case. So happy they will be OK.

    Kudos to Bassfan on covering this tournament. Although I was glad to see Dave win, congrats to all the Top 10 anglers.

  • Sam Bello of Buford, GA writes:

    RE: Drop Dead Craw – This product looks a lot like Gambler's B.B.Cricket. Gambler was Chris Lane's sponsor a couple years ago.

  • Barry Whitt of Ashland, KY writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – They say hold your breath when you take the fish from the water – the fish feels the same as you do. Try this and you'll be surprised how fast you need to get the fish back in water. Now run 1 mile and hold your breath – the fish feels the same as you do, it can't breathe the whole time it's not in the water and it's exhausted.

    I was shocked at how fast you need to return the fish to water. So how many fish do we do brain damage to and never give it a second thought? Makes you hurry a little more when you do it this way.

  • Jonathan Wright of Hebron, KY writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – Sounds to me like Steve is just trying to get attention any way he can. I don't know who the pro is who commited this "fish-care foul" and it really doesn't matter to me. While I don't think it's a good choice to lay fish on the carpet, if they were caught legally the pro has the right to eat those fish if he wants, just like every other American. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for proper fish care. I haven't kept a fish in 15 years, but if I decide to one day am I going to be harassed?

    There seems to be a semi-assault on tournament fishing in this article as well. I hope people realize if it weren't for tournament fishing this website wouldn't exist, and Steve, no one would care what you say about fish care.

    Finally, I would say that if Steve is so concerned about the way fish are handled, maybe he should quit fishing and join PETA. I hear those hooks hurt a fish's mouth!

  • Alex Posey of Cumming, GA writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – I'm dying to know who this angler was.

  • Greg Finchum of London, OH writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – Two words: delayed mortality. There are many, many scientific studies done on fish care and long-term effects. Should be standard reading for all anglers.

  • Tim Eutsler of Fredericksburg, MD writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – You are 100% right, Steve, on calling the angler out for taking pictures in that manner. I don't care if l ever take another picture but l know a lot of people who do and they need to read this post. All anglers in any series who hinge a bass's lower jaw and shake wildly (usually two fish) should lose that weight. After you release your limit, your two biggest fish now have dislocated jaws and die from the inability to eat again.

  • Carter Northcutt of Frankfort, KY writes:

    I am glad to see Mr. Kernan won his appeal and that B.A.S.S. made the right decision in the appeal case. Like Mr. Kernan, I too wonder about some of the coincedences he mentions. I was already thinking that whoever made the protest was somehow connected with the company that said the water is private. In a court of law, I don't believe his protest would have been accepted as it would be considered hearsay. Let's hope that this incident will bring about more positive changes.

  • Dennis Pentecost of Milford,IL. writes:

    RE: Kernan DQ – Come on, D. Tietje, who does not think you were trying to improve your position in the standings? You have stained your reputation forever. Ask N. Wellman!

  • Chris McCall of Brookeland, TX writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – I could not agree more. With all the social media and Facebook, people have forgotten that the bass need oxygen! I am so tired of looking on Facebook and seeing the guys practicing all day or fishing all day and carrying five bass around all day to take their picture at the end of the day! When I am practicing I try not to stick many, let alone take them for a boat ride and then organize a photo shoot of my practice day!

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    The more you read or know about the DQ at the Sabine River, the more it smells. Several things happened that need to be corrected by B.A.S.S.

    B.A.S.S. Rule C1 states: "Interpretation and enforcement of these rules shall be left exclusively to the Tournament Director or his/her designee at a tournament." Then a few lines below that it states: "Subject to the appeal process set forth in paragraph C22, below, the decision of the Tournament Director, his/her designee, or the rules committee shall be final in all matters."

    Rule C22 should have never been included in the B.A.S.S. rules and should be removed ASAP. Rule C1 states "left exclusively to the Tournament Director or his designee," then C22 allows a three-member appeals committee to overrule the Director's decisions. That's direct conflict that needs correcting.

    B.A.S.S. Rule C13, Permitted Fishing Locations. This rule clearly states: "Tournament waters shall be established by the Tournament Director for each tournament. Each competitor must obtain this information from B.A.S.S. Tournament Department. Any waters within these boundaries posted "OFF LIMITS" or "NO FISHING" by state or federal agencies as well as the live-bass-release area established by the Tournament Director and announced at the Tournament Briefing will be Off-Limits.

    Was the water involved in the Sabine DQ posted by a state or federal agency, as stated in this rule? The report was that it was posted by private owners, not a state or federal agency.

    The more you read about this DQ, the more you see mistakes. There is no re-do button to push to correct them. Here's a suggestion to B.A.S.S. that could help correct it as much as possible – B.A.S.S. should allow Mike Kernan to return to the Sabine with a B.A.S.S. official or marshal and fish on Saturday with no advance PR to draw a bunch of spectator boats, no camera boats to draw attention. He should fish the same hours as he would have on Saturday before the DQ. His catch should be weighed on the B.A.S.S. scales and inserted in the standings. If he then makes the cut to fish Sunday, fish under the same conditions and have his catch inserted into the final standings and let the chips fall where they land.

    This should not affect the final standings of the tournament. If it costs B.A.S.S. more money. that should be their loss. They have already offered $10,500.

    The Sabine DQ was not handled correctly. There's many flaws in the B.A.S.S. rules that need to be corrected. Professional bass fishing events should not be subjected to this much bad PR. B.A.S.S. needs a wake-up call.

  • Josh Viator of Jennings, LA writes:

    RE: Kernan wins appeal – In a situation like this, I think that the angler should be able to fish and weigh in the fish that he catches the next day after being DQd until the appeal process is complete. That way if he ends up weighing a good sack on Saturday and advances to Sunday, he can fish Sunday and have a shot at winning. When the appeal process is done, if he wins the appeal, the weight counts on Saturday and Sunday. If he loses the appeal, then dont worry about the weights. At least that way everyone knows what the outcome would have been for Mike. Heck, he might have won the tournement or placed higher than 12th. Now we will never know

  • J.T. Palmore of Blackstone, VA writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – Steve, I know who your are talking about and I agree with your stance on the fish care. It was not the best way to handle the fish. However, I disagree with the way you handled this. You stated your opinion on his Facebook post and then feel the need to bring it to an even bigger limelight by using your writing venues to further diminish the reputation of this person?

    It isn't very hard to search Facebook and find out who you are talking about. My point is, what good comes of badmouthing this individual? If you wanted to write an article on fish care, then by all means, go ahead. If you wanted to write an article on tournaments negatively impacting a fishery, then go ahead. I just don't understand how anyone can benefit by making someone else look bad publicly. Educating the public can be gained without the, "he said this ... and I said that."

  • Steven C. Rockweiler of Luling, LA writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – FIsh care is one deal where the pros are totally lacking. If they are to be looked upon by the many younger anglers coming up as an example of how to do things right, it is sad. Almost all will flip bass into the boat if it looks well-hooked ... to flop all over the carpet. Come on, guys. We can and should be a better example of how to handle our resources!

  • Remi De Matteo of Poydras, LA writes:

    RE: Kernan DQ – It is so frustrating to live in this poor excuse of a Third World country known as Louisiana. The federal navigable water laws are apparantly superceeded by the wealthy landowners here (who think they're "sportsmen"). The "gated" canal issue has been around too long and somehow has to be declared illegal. But with organizations such as Coastal Conservation Association refusing to come down on the side of the fisherman, Louisiana fishermen are continually denied access to navigable waters. Thanks Louisiana politicians for continuing the feudal system you're all used to.

  • Pat Leach of The Colony, TX writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – Steve, great article. Another thing that gets my ire up is when these pros on TV catch a small fish and just pitch it back in the lake. I don't mean just drop it over the side but throw it back in the lake. How disrepectful to the fishery to treat a resourse like that. You will even see some do it when they cull. I applaud you for calling the pro out. If they truly are pros, then respect the fishery and treat the fish as a valuable resource.

  • Sheron K. Brown of Worcester, MA writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – I'm a big fan of NOT laying fish on anything to gauge the size and quality, let alone for bragging rights! The Pro in question should know better and hold himself to higher standards. Next time show them all battered up and ready for the frying pan!

  • Chad Hill of Goreville, IL writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – I applaud Mr. Chaconas for calling out the pro. I wish it would have sparked a positive conversation about the importance of fish care, and maybe it will. On most waters in my part of the world, tournament anglers are loathed. As a weekend tournament competitor, I fight against the stereotype all of the time. Laying 10 quality fish out on carpet like this just gives the haters more fuel to throw on a fire that is already getting hotter.

  • Johnny McLean of Little Rock, AR writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – Great article, Steve. When you really think about it, are "professional" fishermen really conservationists at all? They run around the county burning thousands of gallons of gas, all the while pushing their magic equipment that supposedly gives you an edge over the next angler. In recent months, I have really gotten turned off by their attitudes, from Iaconelli to Swindle to Monroe to Zona. They could all use a piece of humble pie.

  • Kevin Fountain of Madison, WI writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – B.A.S.S apparently recognizes "the importance of protecting the slime coat. B.A.S.S. says fish secrete a protective 'slime' or mucus as a barrier to disease and every effort should be made to avoid removal of the mucus coat. Even touching the slime coat should be avoided." However, they seem to completely contradict this by disallowing landing nets, which leads to fish being hugged and boat flipped to flop all over the floor. It seems so obvious.

  • Jann B. Swaim of Auburn, AL writes:

    RE: Balog on Kernan DQ – So I guess Joe is saying "shut up and fish!"No matter what? I see no credibility to this article.

    I will say that both B.A.S.S. and FLW should eliminate gray areas by staying away from these types of venues. I'm sure the pros have all they can handle without worrying about imaginary boundary lines on the water. If these high-paying venues want the events, let them change the ordinances. Easier said than done.

  • John Paul Plemons of Blooming Grove, TX writes:

    RE: Kernan wins appeal – I'm glad Mike prevailed in the appeal. I've had the pleasure of being around him some years ago. He is a good guy and the kind of honorable competitor who will go all out to beat you fair and square, but has way too much class to cheat.

    As soon as I read about the DQ, I knew he had not knowingly cheated. It's just not his nature. However, this deal sure leaves ol' Dennis looking bad.

  • Terry Jackson of Flowery Branch, GA writes:

    RE: Chaconas opinion – Bigger fouls happen every tournament day when they swing bass in the boat that get dropped on the carpet to flop around and really damage the slime coat. Bring back nets for the bass's sake and eliminate swinging.

  • Nick Renier of Green Bay, WI writes:

    RE: Kernan wins appeal – Very well-written article! I'm glad you guys let all parties be heard! Glad to see the B.A.S.S. appeals process work, as well.

  • Tom Tanner of Jonestown, PA writes:

    RE: Kernan wins appeal – I don't know either competitor, but it sounds like an honest mistake which he reported as soon as he became aware of the problem. Based on this article, the area was not properly posted on the first day and the signs had just been put up. The fact that the other angler just happens to be sponsored by that company and was first out of the cut is more than coincidence. I don't think too many people are buying his story about why he reported this incident, and that's why it got reversed so quickly.

    People should think about the long-term effect on their own reputation before they report someone else.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    Congrats to Mike Kernan for winning his appeal. He will always wonder where he would have finished if he had been allowed to fish Saturday and Sunday. There's a lot of money between 10,500 and the $100,000 that the winner received.

  • Chance Huiet of Hardin, TX writes:

    RE: Kernan DQ – Well, the DQ appeal ruling came back and like everyone who knows Mike thought, it was proved to be a giant case of B.S. I wish we knew the truth behind it all but we will never know, I'm sure. Seems to a bunch of people think that a certain someone filed the DQ so he could cash a check, but that's all speculation. Wish we knew the truth.

  • Chris Lawson of Athens, ON writes:

    RE: Balog on Kernan DQ – Joe, that stunk so bad, I could smell it all the way up at the St. Lawrence River! Those few phone calls would have never taken place if Tietje had made the $10,000 cut. I'd bet on that!

  • Richatd Fox of Front Royal, VA writes:

    RE: Balog on Kernan DQ – Joe, you are spot-on. The whole tourney scene scene is going the wrong way. The money is the driving factor, as in all sports. Lets just hope it doesnt get worse.

    I love the sport, but I don't like all the fighting – after all, it's not boxing. As far as private water, that's another story. I enjoy your articles.

  • John A. Argese of Sayreville, NJ writes:

    RE: Blatant sponsor plugs – Unfortunately, until there is a better tournament business model, the pros will be forced to be hucksters. I've always felt performance on water is the best testimony to a product's value, but I don't build boats or baits. You don't see "Joe Pro Sports Figure" thanking his bat, helmet or shoe company after the game. That's what Sports Illustrated and media advertising are for.

    By the way, there is a new, better model. They call it Major League Fishing.

  • Dustin Daggett of Twin Lake, MI writes:

    RE: Balog on Kernan DQ – This is a clear case of "romanticizing" the past. To think that rules weren't broken, grey areas tested and sportsmanship challenged in the past is ridiculous.

    Today's media sources are why we hear more of these stories now. Twenty-plus years ago, BassMasters and a few other magazines (with ties to the tournament organizations) were the only media covering these events. It certainly wasn't in their best interest to report on these stories.

  • Tommy Yates of Scurry, TX writes:

    RE: Kernan DQd – Being a local angler who has known Mike for many years, his way of dealing with this unfortunate situation shows the ultimate class and professionalism he has always been noted for. Hope his appeal turns out positive, but I know he is already concentrating on his next tournament. Such a class act.

  • Skip Bennett of Texico, IL writes:

    RE: Kenney wins at Toho – Kenney is a standup guy and congratulations on the win.I feel being notified that you lose your title sponsor a couple months before your entry fees are due is disrespectful to the angler and a black eye to the sponsor. We all understand ups and downs in business, but rarely are you not forewarned of major changes coming down the pipe in your business base. I'm glad JT had some other sponsors to get started on the season, but this "lack of customer loyalty" is an example of a dog-eat-dog business world.

  • Steven C. Rockweiler of Luling, LA writes:

    RE: Louisiana trespassing laws – I feel like I could write a book on this subject. I have looked into this for years. Most of my childhood fishing spots are now considered private and non-fishable. More and more water is posted as private ... Keep Out. They are even posting natural lakes and natural bayous as private.

    Louisiana is the only state that interprets the law like it does out of all 50 states. Many marsh owners are doing it, but it started with the massive amounts of wetlands owned by big oil companies and land companies. Greed ... there it is.

    If B.A.S.S. is going to DQ that fellow for trespassing, they better DQ all pros who traveled into Louisiana waters. As soon as they left a natural lake or natural bayou, they were trespassing. Ninety-eight percent of the dug canals in this state were dug on private marshlands ... and the law passed by the legislature says you are trespassing.

  • Caleb Arten of Hollywood, FL writes:

    RE: Palaniuk's porta-potty pattern – That is disgusting. He needs to get tested for diseases.

  • Steven C. Rockweiler of Luling, LA writes:

    There is something "fishy" about Kernan's DQ at the recent Sabine Elite Series event. Not good.

  • Martin D. Lamb of Albia, IA writes:

    RE: Kernan DQ – I have great issue with the DQ of Mr. Kernan. One, the waters in question were unmarkerd. Two, he never fished in the waters so was not in violation of B.A.S.S. rules. B.A.S.S. rules according to its statement read, "No boats or casting behind that boundary while fishing." Since Kernan traveled through the area but did not fish, he did not violate the rule.

    By B.A.S.S.' application, every boater who idled through the off-limits area around the weigh-in should be disqualified, I would think that would be the entire field.

  • Zeth Kinnett of Oakland, CA writes:

    RE: Kernan DQ – This is a pretty low thing to do in my opinion. If it is truly as stated there would have been no way for him to know about the private property until the signs were posted and when they were, he left. The rules use the words any boundaries POSTED off limits will be off limits. The water he crossed was not posted as off limits.

    I hope he wins the appeal. To me, it seems like an angler simply wanted to benefit himself only when he had no chance of winning anyways and that's just a low thing to do. Very uncool.

  • Mike Webb of Orange, TX writes:

    RE: Kernan DQ – If the area had no signs to inform the angler he was in a posted/private area, he should not be DQd. How is he supposed to know? Put yourself in his shoes!

  • Steve Kirby of Columbus, OH writes:

    RE: Kernan DQ – I'm wondering just what part of "navigable waters" folks in the state of Louisiana don't understand? Re US Supreme Court decisions and subsequently promulgated into federal statute, 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(a)(1); 40 C.F.R. § 230.3(s)(1) presents guidance to the USACE as well as the USEPA re navigable waters.

    I know there's been case law established at the "local" i.e., state level which seeks to allow privatization of public waters in the state of Louisiana, but it would seem to me that a reading of the aforementioned statute would negate such restriction. It would be nice if this were decided once and for all. Old English common law, and one which most navigable water statutes are based upon, speaks to "if a log floated in past or was indeed capable of floating upon such waters then these water shall be deemed to be navigable for purposes of public usury."

    I am not an attorney, but I've always been interested in this subject.

  • George Fedor of Castaic, CA writes:

    RE: Lintner's drive – One of the finest people in our sport. He has old-school class and respect for the sport.

  • Randle Lancaster of Shandon, CA writes:

    RE: Lintner's drive – Great to See Jared in the news. He has been the coolest dude to watch make a career out of fishing.

  • Alex Posey of Cumming, GA writes:

    RE: Lintner's drive – Lintner is one of the truly great examples of what a bass fisherman should be. He represents his sponsors well and has a unique style of fishing that is all his own. He also strikes me as one that isn't going looking for local help everywhere the trail goes. He does it on his own with his own abilities and knowledge. More fishermen should strive to be like him.

  • Larry Koch of Fuquay-Varina, NC writes:

    Wanted you to know I really don't like the new "Dock Talk" format on the website. I liked all the stories on one page.

  • Mike Webb of Orange, TX writes:

    In regard to the article about big bass on the Sabine, I wanted to add that both the Neches and Calcasieu rivers seem to produce big bass more consistently than the Sabine River. But I have fished the Sabine for over 40 years and have caught many big 5-pound-plus bass. I have a friend who has caught more than one 6-pound bass in the same spot on one trip. As stated in your article, they do live there, just few and far between big bites.

  • Johnny Jones of Ormond Beach, FL writes:

    RE: Powroznik's ascension – I have known Jacob since he was born and he has a heart the size of Texas. He is the kind of person who I would want working for me – someone who loves their job and their family.

    Congratulations on all of your success – you deserve it. You haven't forgot where you got your start and you are passing that knowledge onto our younger generation by standing by your sponsors. Proud of you, and I know your Mom and Dad are.

  • Rob Lay of Southlake, TX writes:

    Surprised an article didn't come out about the absolute failure of the FLW website right before Toho. They have been working on the website at least for 13 months (they told us that at Okeechobee last year). They released the website the week before Toho and evidently hadn't done much testing (functionality and load). Much of the old functionality is gone – being able to drill down on an angler, sort results by columns and look at pairings. I think the biggest problem was being unable to watch live feeds as it cut in and out, especially on Sunday. Word on the street is everyone is hating the redesign beyond just the bugs.

  • Mark Melega of Rices Landing, PA writes:

    I'm as bad as the next guy at burning gas in my truck and boat, but for some reason I followed the story of California pro Kevin Stewart to see how his season started: 46 hours on the road to Toho for the Bassmaster Open, finished 112th, 46 hours home. Next at the Toho FLW Tour: 46 hours on the road and finished 144th, then 46 hours home.

    "Only In America." Good luck in the next few events, Kevin. This is a crazy sport.

  • Charlie Hartley of Grove City, OH writes:

    RE: Balog on the Classic – We learn a lot from your insight and experience. Your passion and thirst are evident in your writing ... keep sharing, you're a gifted writer!

  • Andy Williamson of Lake Andes, SD writes:

    I realize this site is mostly about the pro tours, but It is interesting to note the anglers in the newly formed Australian B.A.S.S. Nation tournaments having to weigh-in with Australian bass, a species completely unrelated to the black bass. But it is all okay and "legal" with B.A.S.S. and B.A.S.S. Nation director Jon Stewart. This is fine with me, as we can use all the new members we can get.

  • Mark Aaron of Gastonia, NC writes:

    RE: Lefebre's conversion deal – I've known about Quigleys for years and they are awesome vehicles! A good friend of mine has owned several since the late '80s and he'll drive nothing else. Smart move, Dave!

  • Charlie Hartley of Grove City, OH writes:

    RE: Record spotted bass – How cool is it that we have world-record bass available in modern times. When I was younger it looked like all existing records would stand for eternity. We live in very interesting times.

  • Richard Blaine Free of Lufkin, TX writes:

    RE: Morgan's quest for three – And that, kids, is how a grown man goes about his job. That attitude should be packaged and spoon-fed to every young aspiring tournament fisherman. Wow!

  • Tom Baldwin of Cedar Hill, TN writes:

    I always wondered why Dodge was not utilizing the fishing industry to sell its trucks and I'm glad that they are one of FLW's sponsors. I have an '02 RAM and I wouldn't trade it for anything. Never had any problems out of it and my next truck will also be a RAM.

  • Andy Williamson of Lake Andes, S.D. writes:

    The event Johnny Grice won with one bass in 3 days of competition in January 1977 is written about on BassFishingArchives.com.

All Topics   March 2015

Latest News

-->

Video You May Like