The Leader in Pro Bass Fishing News!
Facebook Twitter

Bassfan Feedback

All Topics   Recent FeedBack
  • Charles Bowman of Kernersville, NC writes:

    RE: Balog on turning pro – Interesting article. Unfortunately, he makes the mistake that most wanna-be anglers do when thinking about bass fishing as a career. If you are a professional bass fisherman, you must sell product to make a living to make the business model work. Otherwise, the business model does not work.

    In my opinion, the reality is that most companies do not care if an angler is 2nd, 3rd, 10th, 50th or wherever, if he sells product. Ask the general public who won at West Point just last week and 99.99999 percent of people have no idea what you're talking about. If you want to make money in fishing, you'd better be able to sell product. Tournament fishing is simply one platform and stage that allows you to sell product. Nothing wrong with competition. Nothing wrong with winning trophies and all that ... but keep it in perspective.

    If you don't believe this is true, think of this: If a company did not sell product by participating as an angler or tournament sponsor, would the company pay for sponsorships of any kind? Absolutely not.

    This idea of winning your way to a living is what always derails bass fishermen. Bass fishing is not like golf or basketball or football or hockey ... or any sport where the public will pay simply to view the sport itself. Professional bass fishing must be the stage where a product is promoted because the general public is not going to pay to attend or see the sport itself. It's not bad, it's just different.

    How many Chevys has Earnhardt sold? How are sales influenced at Go-Daddy by Danica? If Earnhardt or Danica sell product, the company sees a return on their investment, and they invest more to sell more and make more money. The athlete makes money as the billboard to sell product. Sell more, make more.

    I like to think about Roland Martin. Is he a great professional angler? Yes. Is is a great promoter of product? Absolutely. Would he have been able to make as good a living, or have his longevity, on his winnings alone?. No way. In my opinion, he gets it. He knows how to promote, he knows how to fish, and he knows how to combine the two to make a great living. My hat is off to Roland Martin.

    If an angler thinks he's going to go fish, finish decent every now and then, then go crawl into a hole and expect money to come flowing to him because he's "great," he's wrong. The dollars would not even follow KVD. If he'll follow the pattern of Roland Martin – work hard, fish hard, promote hard and see himself as a total business and not just pigeonholed as an angler only, he can make it.

    I can think of a long list of non-promoters who were great fishermen and are gone. I can also think of a long list of so-so fishermen who are great promoters who are still in the game.

  • Bobby Colson of Nashville, TN writes:

    RE: Biffle's waterfall adventure – Back in the day I fished a couple pro-ams (now that’s ams as in amateur, not co-angler, which is another whole story of what helped screw up professional bass fishing). Anyway, I had the pleasure of spending 2 days in the boat at two different lakes with Tommy Biffle.

    Tommy is the fishing equivalent of a gym rat in basketball (and that’s a good thing) – anywhere he can get his money in that will take him, he will fish. Him jumping waterfalls doesn’t surprise me at all. I just hope he gets a Classic win under his belt before it’s all over ... and after talking to him and listening to his stories, I have a feeling it’s going to be a long time before it’s over.

  • Martin D. Lamb of Clinton, IA writes:

    Try as I may, I just cannot make any logic of how rules are formulated/applied at B.A.S.S. An angler attempts to buy a fish, he keeps his weight and is awarded a win. An angler goes out knowlingly without fuel and B.A.S.S. bails him out. An angler makes a decision to attempt jumping two waterfalls and he is bailed out, but a guy hits a submerged log, which he could do nothing about, and has to forfeit his day's catch. Our government isn't the only entity lacking in common sense.

  • Jude Dant of Louisville, KY writes:

    RE: Balog on TV shows _ I completely agree. The absolute worst and most prominent thing I see today is a 30-minute fishing show using one specific bait. Really? They essentially pick the right conditions and sometimes a stocked lake/pond and slay them on a "miracle" lure. I think that is the reason Zona's show appeals to me so much. He just goes fishing. If they are killing one lure he might stick with it, but odds are you will see him try a number of things. That is great product placement if you ask me. Not forcing or setting up a situation that works for one lure.

  • Steve Brown of Oakland, TN writes:

    RE: Balog opinion – I agree with Joe's comments that local sticks ought to get off their local waters to see how good they really are. Well, if the local stick's goal is to see how good an angler he really is, then yes, do just that. But if it's to secure a financial future in pro fishing, why bother? There are many regional anglers making a nice sum of money by regularly fishing their home waters. Yeah, they may not make the cover of Bassmaster, but they probably aren't mortgaging their financial future, either.

    The game we call pro bass fishing is gambling, plain and simple. The odds of making a profit are stacked against the participants. Even the sponsored guys who are getting entry fees paid and some expenses covered aren't netting enough cash to live without spousal support or other means of income. You can count on one hand the number of pros who are making top dollar through lucrative sponsorships. There's just not enough money in this game to go around.

    So, why not stay local? Make enough to finance your passion, maybe win a boat every now and then and sleep in your own bed most nights. There's nothing wrong with encouraging up-and-comers to try going to the big-show tours. They just have to do it with a lot of ability and cash. Yes, the ability is a prerequisite. But even some very talented tour guys are not making a living doing this. Man, they must really love it.

  • John Gaulke of Ithaca, NY writes:

    Joe Balog is dead on with his latest piece. I was very surprised by how poorly the majority of local "hotshot" bass guys did in the Cayuga Lake Northern Open held here last year. You hear the same thing with music - we all know local musicians who dominate the local scene but just "haven't gotten the big break." They need to make their own break and it's the same with the aspiring bass pros out there. It's a whole other ball game to make game-changing decisions with the pressure on. If someone wants it bad enough, they'll figure out a way to do it.

  • Rick Pierce of Mountain Home, AR writes:

    RE: Sonar Sound-Off – Miles, that was a very nice piece on Mother's Day week. No matter where your finish was, that one was a fisherman's perspective your mother will understand.

  • Edward Dyer of Alto, MI writes:

    RE: Balog opinion – Having fished the large and small Michigan inland lakes, as well as big reservoirs like Table Rock and Bull Shoals, I think that Joe is right on in his opinion. Even though I have fished Table Rock almost every year since 1980, during the same week, the fishing is different every year and changes daily. It is so much different than fishing an inland Michigan lake where knowing a lot of spots can quite often be enough to get you to the winner's circle. You need to make adjustments daily and hourly to be successful.

    Guys like Kevin VanDam amaze me how consistently they can cash a check. If you put the added pressure of "having to win" in order to pay for your gas home, it puts enormous pressure on most tournament anglers. I've been fishing tournaments for 30 years and have seen hundreds of guys come and go, but there are also a handful of us "old-timers" who can still be a factor in local tournaments, and are realistic that they couldn't make it on the pro tour.

  • Phillip Sexton of Clarksville, AR writes:

    RE: Biffle's waterfall adventure – I gave Tommy credit for being smarter. Stupid is as stupid does.

  • Mark Richards of Houston, TX writes:

    RE: Biffle's waterfall adventure – Am I the only one who thinks that in a pro tournament, a guy who tries to jump two waterfalls in his boat and knocks his lower unit clean off deserves to be done for the day and think about what he just did, instead of having two service mechanics go to where he is and change out his lower unit so he can go fishing? That's ridiculous and about as bad as B.A.S.S. gassing up a a competitor's boat when he runs it out of gas during a tourney day.

    If you are running a sponsor boat the tourney gave you and you have some sort of equipment failure related to normal use, yes, I think they should give you a replacement boat or fix the problem. But if you are flat-out reckless or make a mistake that leads to such a failure, I dont think you are entitled to such assistance unless it is somehow in the interest of safety. It reminds me of the people who hike Mt. Everest in jeans and then call for a helicopter rescue.

  • John Barbaro of Leesburg, FL writes:

    RE: Balog opinion – I tend to agree, however, he left out some important reasons locals would not fare well on the tour. Tour anglers have a network of local anglers who would gladly give up information about the local lakes they live on. These networks didn't happen overnight. They were acquired through years of fishing and with the help of their sponsors. Waypoints and other info is given to these pros like candy. Rules would indicate this info is 30 days old. Yeah, right – I don't think so.

  • John Hempel of Brownstown, MI writes:

    RE: Balog opinion – Joe, nice article and I agree, but one of my questions that comes up often is how much information do the pros acquire from the locals besides the Internet?

  • Jason Houchins of Clarksville, VA writes:

    I will never dispute the level of skill, the mentality, or the commitment that it takes to be a tour-level pro – these guys are good. But if you fish the Elites you are looking at $50,000 in just entry fees for one season. Then most likely you are looking at $50,000 in lodging, gas, repairs and whatever else you need for cross-country travel. Money has nothing to do with it? Really?

  • Robert Dixon of Lewistown, PA writes:

    RE: Balog opinion – Couldn't agree more.

  • Justin Miller of Bay Saint Louis, MS writes:

    Mr. Balog has the right to his opinion. However, I would like to present another perspective on this issue. It hits close to home for many accomplished anglers.

    I have spent the better part of my life pursuing this sport and am friends with anglers who have fished both B.A.S.S. and the FLW Tour. I've heard the truth of what it takes to be a "touring pro" directly from anglers who frequently contribute to or are featured on this website. However, I'll simply use my own example instead of bringing multiple "household names" into this.

    I am currently in 5th place in the EverStart Central Division points race. I have fished four EverStart events this year. I am 26 years old and a full-time professional angler. I have no other job and have financed my season with my own money. Financial sponsorship has been nearly unobtainable for me this year.

    In 2013, I began at Okeechobee, on to Guntersville, Lake of the Ozarks, and I just got home from Pickwick last weekend. None of the venues we have fished this year, less Lake of the Ozarks, have I ever been to before. Regardless, my performance has been consistent and I am in position to compete for an Angler of the Year title in the division. This could essentially qualify me for the Forrest Wood Cup and propel my career with FLW Outdoors.

    However, if you examine the fine print, you will read that the Forrest Wood Cup qualification for Angler of the Year is predicated on a commitment to either a complete EverStart Series or the FLW Tour in 2014. In other words, a minimum of at least $4,000 in entry fees before you ever get to the Cup, of which you have already qualified for.

    As for angling ability, I consider myself a good angler. I practice from daylight to dark, spend hours in map study prior to every event and research all possible outlets prior to each event. I have spent hour upon hour studying my graphs. My tackle is pristine and plentiful. There are few techniques I am not familiar with. I put my time into every venue I visit.

    My point is this: There is no doubt in my mind that I (as well as others with similar stories) could and would be a full-time touring angler with the appropriate financial support. As it stands now, I will most likely not finish the season and will lose the opportunity to compete for a Forrest Wood Cup berth. This is completely due to the fact that I do not have the finances to commit to another season in 2014, regardless of whether I make the Cup or not. There is no guarantee I will win enough money to replenish what I have already invested and provide the opportunity to fish next season.

    This has nothing to do with my angling ability, having to compete in multi-day events or competing away from home. It has everything to do with the financial uncertainty of being a professional angler.

    This is the reality of the sport we all love, or at least the strong perspective of some of us.

  • Todd Langford of Ashburn, VA writes:

    RE: Balog opinion – Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Joe, that's the funniest article on bass fishing I have ever read! Surely you wrote that with all your boys on the tour in mind, because "pro bass fishermen" are so much better than any poor guy who just fishes when time permits. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! My sides hurt!

  • Bill McDonaugh of Thorndale writes:

    RE: Balog opinion – Joe seems to be taking shots in the dark with this article. He says all the money in the world would not make a pro. Then he writes, "When a guy feels he has a year or 2 to prove himself, and he knows sponsors are watching and just getting a check could be the deciding factor on whether or not he lives to fish another day, I highly doubt his decision-making process is the same as Skeet Reese, who woke up and “just went fishing” on day 4. Regardless of the outcome of his decision, I’m guessing Skeet isn’t too worried about what it’s going to cost to fill up the tank in his truck at the end of the day so he can head off to the next tourney."

    If the angler had all the money, he would not have to worry about his sponsors or cashing a check. He would just be able to concentrate on fishing.

    Not saying everyone could make it as a pro, but many could if they did not have to make their decisions based on finances.

  • Michael Scanlan of Hazel Park, MI writes:

    What is it with Skeet Reese not responding to requests for comments from BassFan? If I'm not mistaken, this is not the first time he has refused to comment. Whether he chooses to accept it or not, BassFan is important to this sport, and no professional athlete can afford to snub the press. Spending 10 or 15 minutes going over a winning pattern is not too much to ask.

  • Justin Wood of Sanford, MI writes:

    What's the deal with Skeet not returning calls? If I recall, this is something he's done before to BassFan. Almost seems like he is too important to waste his time talking to the fans.

  • Brian Henderson of Puyallup, WA writes:

    RE: Sunline Strong Performer – Great job, Yusuke! He is a real stand-up guy, giving credit where it is due.

All Topics   Recent FeedBack

Latest News