The Leader in Pro Bass Fishing News!
Facebook Twitter

Bassfan Feedback

All Topics   April 2015
  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    RE: Balog on lure colors – In 1971 we started B.A.S.S. Seminars with John Powell and Roland Martin doing most of the seminars. This allowed me to fish across the USA with two great bass anglers. John Powell was sponsored by a company making plastic worms, so he got all the plastic worms and all the different colors that he could use. When he fished he would put a large pile of worms on the floor near his trolling motor foot pedal, all colors. He never made more than a few casts with any worm until he changed worms and he never looked at the color, he would just bend down and grab a worm off the floor. I asked him why he did not check the color and his reply was, "It does not matter, you will get a strike within 3 feet of where it lands. If not, pick it up and cast again to another location."

    I watched John catch hundreds of bass using this method – cast it to a location, fish it 3 feet and make another cast. He never selected a color, just took whatever he picked up. Roland Martin used the same method – he would cast to a spot, fish it a short distance, then hit another spot, and he did not care what color it was. I asked him about color and his reply was, "It's where you put it that's important. If you put it near a bass they will strike it within 2 to 3 feet, so the more casts you make the more fish you will catch. It's where you put it, not the color."

    John and Roland won their share of B.A.S.S. events without being concerned about the color of their lure. Location was the most important thing.

  • Mike Nolan of Grosse Ile, Michigan writes:

    RE: Balog on Michigan regs – I'm surprised to hear someone who understands the danger and has been so outspoken about not allowing tournament anglers to fish during the spawn around the Bass Islands in Lake Erie (even though he participated) to be so seemingly open to the proposal of allowing catch and delayed release, specifically for tournament anglers, during the heart of the spawn in Michigan. Why would you assume a different result than what Lake Erie experienced?

    The fact of the matter is no scientist, biologist, or ichthyologist can say what will happen if tournament anglers in Michigan are allowed to hold stressed out (from the rigors of spawning) adult fish in their livewells for hours, bounced across 4-foot waves, and bagged up and weighed in, before being released miles from their spawning beds. How many 12- to 15-year-old bass will suffer delayed mortality?

    You have to consider more scientific evidence than the number of eggs that can successfully hatch even if a large number of guarding adult fish are removed from their nests. Comparing statistics from Florida in Michigan is ridiculous! The Florida strain of bass is not even the same species as what we have in Michigan; it grows a pound a year (reaching legal length limits in that same time), it doesn't live as long, it needs a different environment to survive, and reacts different to environmental changes. A Michigan bass doesn't reach legal length limit for 3 or 4 years. Michigan bass live longer and can survive a much colder environment and their spawn is a small fraction of the spawning season in Florida.

    Yes, you can catch a much bigger fish in Florida or some of the other Southern states that don't have closed bass seasons but the fishing average size and numbers is better here in Michigan, Minnesota, and Northern states (that have closed seasons during the heart of the spawning season) than any of those Southern states despite what you see or read about the tournaments held in the South during spawning season when fish are protecting their nests. That's why experienced national tournament anglers like KVD and Kim Stricker opposed allowing tournament anglers to delay release. They realize how good our fishing is compared to other parts of the country.

    The year-round catch and immediate release issue is totally different than the proposal to allow tournament anglers to catch and delay release, but it seems to be lumped together by many anglers who like to think in black and white. The bottom line to all of this is our fishing is some of the best in the country for average size and numbers. We won't know for sure what our fisheries can withstand as far as pressure until we go past that point ... then it's too late! I fish tournaments and would love it if we could do it year-round with no detriment to our catch rates, but judging from what I have experienced in other states, that is not possible. The risk outweighs the benefits!

  • Mark Nichols of Tallahassee, FL writes:

    RE: Benton DQd at Beaver – I understand that rules must be in effect, but to DQ an angler because he dropped a bait in the water to remove a prior backlash sounds like splitting hairs. Should have been a decision made prior to the day 2 launch. Shame on you, FLW.

  • Boots Beasley of Mooresville, NC writes:

    RE: Rose DQd at Beaver – Shame on Rose – a rookie mistake. I do feel for him, but he should have read the rules and understood them.

  • Steve Lindner of Lake Havasu City, AZ writes:

    RE: Benton DQd at Beaver – A new rule needs to be inserted: the "common sense rule." This rule will overrule all other rules. I've been around a long time and this rule is applicable in most rules. It's just not fair when there is a gray area. Someone has to have the balls to make a decision. If it happened the way I read it, FLW's decision was not correct. Benton has the right to be upset. Rules need to be enforced if laws are broken and someone gains an unfair advantage. Sometimes it takes common sense to make things right.

  • Rusty Rommel of Poplar Bluff, MO writes:

    RE: Benton DQd at Beaver – FLW wonders why they're struggling and lagging behind B.A.S.S. –stupid rulings like this. They might as well disqualify probably half the field who checks baits in the water in the mornings in the off-limits area. Sad they ruin a young man's good season over something this petty.

  • Matt Belletini of Birmingham, MI writes:

    RE: Balog on Michigan catch-and-release – Joe, does a nice job explaining the process we just went through here in Michigan. One piece I would like to clarify is that the two proposals presented to the Natural Resources Commission were not among the four options generated by the Warm water Resources Steering Committee and presented at the public meetings. I would like to see science prevail in our state. Keeping the status quo or limiting the harvest season does not ensure a healthy fishery going forward. As Bass anglers, we’ve been lucky so far with exotics and habitat change, but our luck won’t last forever.

  • Dave Reault of Livonia, MI writes:

    RE: Balog on Michigan catch-and-release – Great piece, Joe. I've been involved in this process for the last two years, participating on DNR committees and also attending and testifying at the NRC meetings. It's great now having catch-and-release fishing for bass legal year-round! My takeaway from all of this is that it is more important than ever for bass anglers to support and participate in organizations like The Bass Federation and B.A.S.S. Nation. Your article is right on about participation and becoming more informed as to the science behind the issues. Thanks!

  • Rob Dixon of Lewistown, PA writes:

    RE: Balog on Michigan catch-and-release – Joe is right on the money talking about small club tournaments and their treatment of bass. I've been to several tournaments from Rayovacs to BFLs to small local club tourneys. Let me be clear though first, it's not every club, but in my experience, it is most. I cringe when I see the way the bass are treated – laying out on boat decks, being walked across parking lots in bags that have no water in them, weighed in a clothes basket and walked 100 yards down to the lake to be dumped in after they have been out of the water for over 4 or 5 minutes, sometimes longer. How this is legal is beyond crazy.

    The DCNR, Fish Commission, or whoever is responsible for fisheries management in the state should be present for all tournaments and make sure this 1980s way of running an event is no longer happening. It's not OK to lay a bass on your carpet, it's not OK to put 5 fish in your weigh-in bag and walk across a parking lot with no water in the bag, it's not OK to let some guy stand there holding his 3-pounder horizontally to show his buddies how awesome he is after the fish has already spent multiple minutes out of the water. Man I could go on and on, but to sum it up, this is 2015, not 1995, and we should be knowledgeable enough by now to know how to treat the fish we all love to catch.

  • Terry Bone of Wixom, MI writes:

    RE: Balog on Michigan catch-and-release – Joe, this is a great explanation and I think a very accurate view of the activities. Thanks for putting this together and providing the truth!

  • Charles Bowman of Kernersville, NC writes:

    RE: Lightning at Rayovac – I am not surprised by this thunderstorm experience. I've written an opinion piece that ran here on BassFan regarding this very issue. Since then, tournament organizations continue to start tournaments knowing the weather that is coming. Tournament anglers have been killed by lightning and others will be.

    I do not know the solution, but I do know that it is foolish to run miles from the nearest shelter, knowing that a dangerous storm is only an hour or so away. We're going to have to solve this issue somehow.

  • Tommy Cauley of Bee Branch,Ark. writes:

    RE: Balog on Michigan catch-and-release – Well said. No one wants to look back, just do what's in front of them. Then when something's wrong they want to blame someone and just complain and never be involved in it.

  • John Gaulke of Ithaca, NY writes:

    Congrats go out to Dustin Connell for his great win at the Alabama River Southern Open. I noticed he was wearing a pro-style shirt with the names of various sponsors on it. I wonder how many of the "true pros" have an issue with a non-pro wearing a shirt like that. Dustin clearly fished like a pro.

    I don't care what kind of shirt an angler wears, I like it when they "talk" with their angling prowess.

  • Mark Melega of Rices Landing, PA writes:

    I'm calling (for lack of a better term) B.S. on the lures sticking out of the bass and catching in the nets. This sounds like a "plug" for the netters to blame the fate of the bass on the anglers.

  • Jim Liner of Pintlala, AL writes:

    We have been using the Millennium Marine boat seats for a year and a half at our Ray Scott Outdoors resort. We have had a large number of people come in and some large people, as well. The Millennium seat is the only one I have seen that is rated for 400 pounds. We have yet to break one. Plus, you have the advantage of the mesh that is cooler and fast-drying.

    I do not normally say this about products we test, but these seats are perfect. My favorites are the B100 and the B200.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    RE: Velvick's vegetable oil – B.A.S.S. Rule C13 states: "Competitors wishing to change fish habitat by placing any object in the tournament waters may do so if such action does not violate state or federal laws." Was the vegy oil trick checked out to be sure it's legal?

  • Steven C. Rockweiler of Luling, LA writes:

    I fish inland waters on the Louisiana Delta, so we not only pursue bass, but reds, speckled trout and flounder also. During the '60s, '70s and 80's, a fisherman could hardly catch a 4-pound speckled trout. This was due to monofilament gillnets. I would watch them put out a couple miles of nets strung together at an inlet and when they ran them, the results were astounding. Fish of every species, and the larger ones were toast.

    It took an almighty effort to ban those monofilament gill nets. Those guys got rich off of the public's resources. There are literally thousands of seafood restaurants in south Louisiana and New Orleans, and when tourists come here, they head to those places. The restaurant industry formed an association and it was a multi-year fight in the state legislature with all the money floating around trying to ban these nets ... which finally happened just over 20 years ago.

    Nylon string gill nets are still allowed with a license. These fishermen are supposed to stay with those nets at all times and run them frequently. The Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries used to keep tabs on them fairly well, but with budget cuts and other financial stains, they do not now. They will make a check if called – this happened this winter in the Lake Verret region here.

    I don't really care for the nets, but we have to do something. We had miles of good grass – hydrilla, coontail and milfoil – but we have very few places with it now. When Hurricane Isaac hit my area in 2012, we had devastating fish kills. I went out to survey the extent just a few days after and was shocked at the thousands of Asian carp dead on the water. These were large carp in the 20-plus-pound range. These fish have spread in record time throughout the South and somehow we will need to deal with them. They are destructive.

  • Skip Bennett of Texico, Il writes:

    RE: Tennessee River gill-netting – I personally talked to one of the owners at a fish processing plant that's harvesting Asian carp. When I asked about how often he catches bass, his response was "very little, and 90 percent of the time it's from bass that have lures sticking out of their mouths that catch the net." I personally want the carp taken out and us bass fishermen need to check our lines and knots so we can let the gill-netters get their job done without our interference of poor execution.

  • Joe Zellmer of Mitchell, SD writes:

    RE: Velvick's vegetable oil – Give Byron credit for using natural vegetable oil. No respect for the anglers using dish soap and adding phosphates to the water. The dish soap dopes remind me of walleye fishermen using WD-40 as an attractant years ago.

  • J. David Speakman of Mesquite, TX writes:

    RE: Velvick's vegetable oil – First, I am a very serious bass fisherman and tournament angler. I believe our waters have enough oil and chemicals in them without the aid of fishermen deliberately and intentionally spaying oil from a water-blaster of any kind into our lakes. I would be ashamed to have my name associated with this kind of abuse to our lakes, rivers and streams.

  • George Mrozinski of Sarver, PA writes:

    The FLW website is a cluster. Hope they didn't pay much to have it built. Seen better stuff from do-it yourself sites.

  • Warren Wolk of Richboro, PA writes:

    RE: Velvick's vegetable oil – Not meaning to be "that guy", but does all that oil going into the water have any kind of negative effect on the environment? I know critters and oil don't exactly get along too well. I know the cooking oil/oil spill analogy is a bit far-fetched, but if there is a negative impact on any plant or animal the practice shouldn't be allowed in tournaments, IMHO. As a dock owner (and avid bass fisherman), I know I wouldn't be happy having a film of any kind of oil being intentionally put on the water around my dock/boat by someone. Just my thoughts.

  • Martin D. Lamb of Albia, IA writes:

    In response to the article concerning Velvick and his sight-fishing tactic to slick the surface of the water, I am fairly certain that cooking oil and dishwashing liquid would be considered pollutants. I would be curious as to what most state DNR offices would think of anglers running around dispersing these liquids into the watersheds.

  • Maynard L. Logan of Fort Wayne, IN writes:

    Anyone else disappointed with FLW's new (very) cluttered website? It's very viewer unfriendly to have to search all over to find anything. Along with that, the quality of their photography is pretty pathetic.

  • Johnny McLean of Little Rock, AR writes:

    RE: Balog on La Perla Ranch – Joe, I watched the show and did not enjoy it. My 97-year-old grandma could have caught the same fish as Zona. I am sure it's fun for clients and good advertisement for the place, but it takes no skill, so should not count as anything but a fun day on the lake for those who can afford it.

  • Jim Liner of Pintlala, AL writes:

    RE: Sonar's status – Another well-written piece, Miles. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Come see us.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – B.A.S.S. and FLW should add a rule immediately concerning life vests that do not inflate automatically. Require these type of vests to be attached to something like the kill switch rule, so if you go out, the vest will inflate automatically.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    RE: Reese's winning pattern – Great article on just how it happened, very informative on details of how Reese won the event, also how many tour anglers help each other. That was what B.A.S.S. was founded on.

  • Randy Brandenburg of Frisco, TX writes:

    RE: Sonar's status – Good for you, Miles. Keep it up. We will see you on tour soon. I'm pulling for you.

  • George Kramer of Lake Elsinore, CA writes:

    As I read over Iaconelli's remarks explaining his dismal final day, I really think the injury played a much larger role in his assessment/decision-making.

    Here's why. If a helicopter buzzes your boat at 8 a.m. that's kinda weird. If another one buzzes you at 9 a.m. I'd probably want to check the direction it's headed. And if it gets to be 10 minutes to 10 and you're hearing a chopper engine, you've got to roll.

    To me, that sole 3-pounder in the box should have sounded like a Huey with the hammer down.

    A pro like Ike could have done more – except, it seems, for full effects of a "bad wheel."

  • Mike Saganich of Lincoln Univ., PA writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – What good is that PFD? it should not be allowed. What if the driver or co-angler was to be knocked out? They would drown. I would never use one of them.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    Mike Kernan was DQd at the Sabine River in 12th place, so he did not get to try for No. 11 on Day 3 or 4. He was later reinstated at No. 12, but too late to try for No. 1. Ike just proved at Guntersville how quick you can go from 12th to 1st or 1st to 12th.

  • Ken Zipidelli of Ringoes, NJ writes:

    RE: Final day at Guntersville – Poor Ike. Don't worry, like the Delaware River, you will have a free one again this year at the Chesapeake Bay.

  • John Cranford of Greensboro, NC writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – I had this happen to me two times on same boat. Found out it was kill switch shorting out just long enough to lose power for a second; never quit running, just sort of a skip. The boat turned at a 9-degree angle fast. Luckily I wasn't tossed out. I replaced the kill switch and it never happened again.

  • Doug Chessmore of Santa Barbara, CA writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – The same thing happened to me in a team tournament. I've had 40 years experience, both commercial and sport. I was making a sharp turn (calm water) and hit a small wake and did a 360. At first I thought the hydraulic steering broke. I have an awesome boat. The only thing I can figure is that is was the perfect storm scenario – the chine had hit the small wake when a lot of the boat was out of the water. It never has happened again.

  • Ed Adams of Princeton, WV writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – As far as the boat turning 180 degrees, I personally had that happen to me in a state tournament years ago. What caused my boat to do this was a small stick approximately an inch in diameter and about 4 feet long. It got in between the motor and transom. As far manually operated life vests, they should be illegal to use. If you hit your head on the way out of the boat you don't have a chance.

  • Bill Spindler of Turnersville, NJ writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – If boat steering showed no failure, then I feel a foreign object such as a short length of of board or a fair-size piece of plastic, etc., got caught on the front of the motor and temporarily disturbed the water flow. I had that happen to me years ago and it was like a car on a sudden patch of ice – no control and the stern of the boat suddenly went sideways. The board was still stuck on the front of the motor when I got the boat stopped.

  • Jack McGee of Lacrosse, WI writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – Why is FLW looking over Cox's boat? Shouldn't it be a lawyer, insurance agent or third-party inspector?

  • Shawn Murphy of Nicholasville, KY writes:

    In reference to Guido Hibdon, what a wonderful person as well as s wonderful family. I have talked with him a couple times (even gave him some fried fish at Toho). This family has a bond that can't be broken and I sure hope to see such a great leader in the sport return.

  • Rob Dixon of Lewistown, PA writes:

    No offense to the Hibdons, but two check-paying finishes in over two years really isn't "tour-level" material. Payden would have never been on the tour to begin with if not for his name and Guido is 68 years old. He's lived the dream for far longer than most will ever get to, so maybe it's his time to hang it up. If they were finishing well this wouldn't have became an issue.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    Sorry to see the Hibdons hanging it up. They have been headliners since 1980, when Guido won the back to back B.A.S.S. events on Lake Of The Ozarks in 1980-81. Guido and Stella were always there, then the kids and grandkids followed. Sad to see the great ones disappearing.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    The recent Sabine River Elite Series tournament had 13 ties in the standings on the last day. These ties were broken, I suppose, by B.A.S.S. Rule C20. I've read Rule C20 several times and I don't understand any of it. But if you look at the Angler of the Year standings posted after the Sabine event you will notice that the tied anglers have a separation of one Classic point between them – each have the same weight but not the same Classic points, so one angler lost a Classic point in the tiebreaker and so did each angler below him in the standings. At the next tie the same happened because of the tie-breaker.

    Look at Brandon Palaniuk in a 100th place tie with Charley Hartley at 3-02 weight. Hartley wins the tiebreaker and finishes in 100th place with one Classic point, while Palaniuk is listed at 101 with zero Classic points. Did Palaniuk not lose 13 Classic points to tiebreakers above him? Why is it necessary to break ties unless it's for 1st place or last place? Why should you lose Classic points because someone tied above you?

    Think about this. Is this the correct way to handle ties?

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    On the B.A.S.S. web page it has an article titled "Sabine Standings and Points Adjusted." At the end of the article it states Click HERE for results, but it does not list any Angler of the Year points. Scroll down to Toyota AOY Standings, then click on Full Standings and you will find more confusion. In one place Russ Lane is listed 32nd and 33rd is vacant. Another place you will find Russ Lane listed in 33rd place with 69 points and Casey Scanlon listed next at 34th with 67 AOY points. What happened to the 68th Classic point?

  • Remi DeMatteo of Poydras, LA writes:

    RE: Balog on DQ – First of all, I'm shocked Nate Wellman's name came up in a gray area ... such an outstanding sportsman. Next, as a lifetime Louisiana resident, I encourage B.A.S.S. and FLW to stay out of Louisiana as long as fishermen are denied access to free-flowing water.

    Noticeably absent from this debacle are local B.A.S.S. groups , the Coastal Conservation Association, etc. Apparently, the average fishermen don't have enough money or present enough photo ops.

  • Richard Moseley of Wetumpka, AL writes:

    RE: TTBC – Where is Scott Canterbury in this field?

    BassFan says: Only the Top 15 in last year's Angler of the Year standings gained berths. Canterbury finished 26th.

  • Joe Valerio of Red Creek, NY writes:

    RE: Frazier's decorum – Great to hear in this day and age! Young fishermen could stand to learn a thing or two from this young man.

  • Kevin Warner of Lake Charles, LA writes:

    RE: Balog on DQ – Not sure how you can say that the Sabine River doesn't offer crowd interaction and support. Pretty sure they broke records for crowd attendance in 2013 and had an amazing turnout for 2015. Every other competitor said so on stage. I talked to several guys and the ones complaining were the ones that weren't catching fish.

    These are the best pros in the world. They don't always need to be on a lake catching 100 pound totals. Let's see just how good they are.

    The problem is not the Sabine. Sometimes things happen that no ones expects to happen. The whole situation sounds shady and someone isn't telling the whole truth. But don't blame it on a venue that made for a great tournament because someone decided to put up some posted signs on day 2.

  • Chris Lawson of Athens, ON writes:

    RE: Tietje back to 54th – There has to be a consequence to having a protest overruled. Otherwise, at every tournament the 54th-place guy would be protesting someone in the cut. Good grief, Tietje was a hundred miles away!

  • Jim Liner of Montgomery, AL writes:

    There is no way that 17-pounder in Georgia was 33 inches long. Theoretically, it would weigh about 27 pounds. Is this a misprint?

  • Clifford Wiedman of Lufkin, TX writes:

    RE: TTBC sponsor exemptions – I wish they would have picked Gagliardi. He is your Forrest Wood Cup champion and he drives a Tundra.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    RE: Balog on DQ – This is the worst ruling I've seen from B.A.S.S. The first mistake was DQ'ing an angler who then filed a protest and was DQ'd before the appeal was heard by the committee. The second mistake was having Rule 22, which allows a three-person committee to overrule the tournament director.

    The DQ'd angler was denied the right to fish days 3 and 4 to improve his chance to move up from 12th, or fall below 12th. Next, after the appeals, he was awarded $10,500. Next, the 54th-place angler who was moved up to 53rd and inside the cut as result of the DQ, he finished day 3 at 33rd place and won $10,000. Later B.A.S.S. reversed this and moved him back to 54th and returned the $10,000.

    How can they do this. He did not violate any B.A.S.S. rule? So one angler gets DQ'd and makes $10,500, the other places 33rd and gets no money.

    B.A.S.S. should have handled this much better – lots of money was involved. This DQ could cost either angler a trip to the Classic, which would mean lots of money plus sponsors. This is not how you run a professional bass tournament. There is no way to reverse what's happened, but B.A.S.S. could start by allowing the DQ'd angler to fish day 3 and let the chips fall were they land. The other part is what effect it had on anglers below 12th and 33rd.

  • John A. Argese of Sayreville, NJ writes:

    Re: Balog on DQ – 1. Time Limit on protest? One hour. 2. Who can protest? Competitors or marshals unless dangerous condition created. 3. Who will be protested? All competitors in off-limits area, not a pick and choose.

    Good for now.

  • Dustin Daggett of Twin Lake, MI writes:

    RE: Balog on DQ – Balog, you rock! Every week is must-read!

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    RE: Tietje back to 54th – It just gets worse. How can B.A.S.S. DQ Tietje for Saturday? He did not violate any B.A.S.S. rules and he still has the right to appeal the B.A.S.S. decision, as B.A.S.S. was the one that moved him into the Saturday cut by DQ'ing the angler who was reported, before his appeal was finished. The mistake was to DQ anyone in the middle of an event who had filed an appeal. There's always time to DQ after the appeal is heard.

    Either way you slice it, the DQ halted Mike Kernan's chance to win $100,000 instead of being awarded $10,500. This last move was worse than the first one.

  • Eric Gandy of Baton Rouge, LA writes:

    RE: Tietje back to 54th – As it should be!

  • Bryan Heaberlin of Lake Helen, FL writes:

    RE: Georgia giant – Sounds like a joke to me. The fish-weight calculator would have a fish of those dimensions at 29 pounds!

  • Tim Brown of Ridgetop,TN writes:

    RE: Cox's accident – I'm glad everyone survived, but more investigation needs to be done. The story, when I first was reading it, sounded like the two guys were on the bottom of the lake and the boat was still propelling above them. Odd that both jackets did not go off – sounds like they may not have been used, or were under a lot of clothing?

    Also the inflatables (in my opinion) are not as reliable as the zip-up/buckle-up jackets you can get. I sold my auto-inflatable years ago.

All Topics   April 2015

Latest News

-->

Video You May Like