The Leader in Pro Bass Fishing News!
Facebook Twitter

Bassfan Feedback

All Topics   August 2009
  • Jim McLaughlin of Lyn, ON, Canada writes:

    RE: Bobby and Garry Garland – Just a quick note to say that these guys will both be missed now and to say thank you to them for helping me many years ago when they overnighted a 100-pack of Gitzits to me at a hotel room during the Canadian Bass Championships in 1990 on Lake Simcoe north of Toronto. I ended up taking home my second title on those very baits under some real tough conditions.

    I am now, and have been a full-time fishing industry person all my adult life and without that bag of Gitzits I might not have been where I am today. Thanks, guys. May you both rest in peace.

  • Larry Green of Charlotte, NC writes:

    RE: Mercury labor – It is really unfortunate that folks continue to put their trust in a union. This time it looks like it will really hurt some folks with a loss of an employer in that area. Maybe folks will start to learn that a union can't guarantee anything. I believe they will continue to shrink and eventually die off. We must remain competitive in the global marketplace and unions hurt that ability considerably. I'm sorry for the employees who initially knew the right thing to do and take what the company was offering.

  • Rick Garland of Kingman, AZ writes:

    I appreciate the comments regarding my father. There are many rumors out there surrounding the events of my father and uncle, most of which have been "created" by a woman by the name of Judy Chandler. I do hope that any facts you may print going forward are verified by someone other than this person. Again, thank you all for your comments regarding my father, Garry Garland.

  • Dave Dickens of Sarasota, FL writes:

    RE: Chad Griffin's Oneida win – Way to go, Chad! Kick Skeet's behind! Hey, I thought I was the only BASS member from Alaska in the '70s! You did what most of us can only dream of...congrats! If BASS ever returns to Florida, I'll give you a hand (if you need it). Again, way to go! Go Bartlett Bears!

  • Alexander Voog of Chicago, IL writes:

    BASSCAR AOY. Ah, no. The regular season, and therefore the Angler of the Year trophy, should have been awarded after Oneida. These next two tournaments are just bonus tourneys for finishing in the Top 12. They are great for the 12 qualifiers, sponsors, as well as us BassFans, as stand-alone tournaments, but for ESPN/BASS to pull a direct copycat of the NASCAR playoff is lame, lazy, and degrades the trophy's impact.

    Do you think KVD will be PO'd if he finishes last, or for that matter, anything other than 1st in this format? The train wreck continues.

  • Jon Brown of Las Vegas, NV writes:

    RE: BassFan World Rankings – How exactly do you rate Skeet Reese 3rd? When you read the resume in your latest article about Skeet it blows you away and the only person you can think of who beats him is KVD. Forty-five top 10s, four wins, $2million in earnings, AOY in '07, Classic '09. Led the regular season AOY in '09. Seems like this year Reese is a clear number 2. He would be dominant in BASS if it wasn't for KVD.

  • Scott Wall of Millbrook, AL writes:

    Regarding the Mercury move: One, there are probably more boats to hang their motors on in the South and getting them delivered will be cheaper now that the units don't have to ship from Wisconsin to Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Florida, but can instead come from Oklahoma. This, and the fact that the labor force is probably going to be a little cheaper in Oklahoma than Wisconsin. Two, unions are going to have to be dissolved all across the country if businesses are going to continue to operate at a healthy profit. I worked with an automotive company that had a union and saw firsthand the complete lack of motivation when you know you are going to get paid whether you work or not.

    Unions push for a raise every year and get it. Each year unions expect more and put out less. Most unions are such a strong force that they hamstring a company's ability to react quickly and effeciently. Look at the Toyota and Honda plants, they are non-union with American workers and they are kicking Chevy and Ford's butt, both in sales, quality, and technology. Why? Because the employees and managers are motivated to succeed and they don't have to play to union rules.

    Third, Mercury is probably heavily entrenched in upper management and has too many high-level execs making decisions that don't effect their bottom line either. I recommend to all union employees to try and get a job in sales for a couple of years and see how good you have it. I also recommend to all CEOs to start tying your middle and upper management to performance-based incentives and stop letting the accountants, strategists, and consultants soak up all the profits. Until American corporations learn to cut out the fat they are not going to survive, and the ones that do will.

  • Kevin Vida of Clare, MI writes:

    RE: Lytle retirment – Curt, good luck to you. You are retiring for all the right reasons. Sometimes people forget about the sacrifice we make when we go on the road and it's the toughest part of fishing, being away from your family.

  • Frank Sabo of Evans, GA writes:

    Fishing the tour = every guy's dream.

    A professional angler retiring to be with his family = priceless.

    Curt Lytle will be missed.

  • Michael Thomas of High Point, NC writes:

    Again my point, look at the numbers at the Fort Madison Stren event – 100 boats at best. Another event scheduled by Bill Taylor at FLW. Why don't they wake up and let the tournament director decide when and where to have the event? Ron Lappin knows how to plan the year – let him do the scheduling and keep everyone one else out of the picture, especially those people who have never run a tournament in their carear.

    The numbers will keep falling if FLW doesn't let the coach do the coaching. It's real simple – let those with experience do the work and let the others learn from experience.

  • John Schaefer of Walnut Cove, NC writes:

    RE: Mercury labor – What good is a contract these days? Do you think Mercury Marine would reopen
    the contract on the union's request if the cost of living got high? I don't think so.

    I'm buying a new 2010 boat and I bet it'll have an E-Tec or Yamaha on it.

  • Gary Cossaboom of Ottawa, ON, Canada writes:

    I agree with Harold Sharp and his comments on where this industry is headed. If FLW and BASS don't wake up and start working together, tournament fishing at any kind of professional level may cease to exist. Sure, there's always good times and tough times, the cycle keeps going. During tough times, though, we need to work together to survive.

  • Will Silvers of Sussex, WI writes:

    RE: Mercury labor – Way to go! Doing the right thing even if it costs you money is a rare event in today's society.

  • Perry Matherne of Galliano, LA writes:

    Hey Mercury Marine, don't try to fix something that ain't broken, because don't forget money is the root of all evil. As for KVD, get over it!

  • Ron Ronco of Paris, TN writes:

    RE: Mercury labor – Greedy unions havent learned enough by now. What we need is for Obama to buy some boat companies, or better yet, cash for Yamahas!

  • Jon Brown of Las Vegas, NV writes:

    Well said, Harold. I liked your piece on "Where are we headed?" Again, I can only add that how can you expect the tours to stay viable if they have 11 tournaments? There could be a reason, as in the venues are not paying FLW or BASS to come. Many reasons are there we don't know about. Food for thought.

    As to Walmart bailing out, Walmart has a plan to destroy their competition by trying to offer a product that can't be matched. They will only stay for so long. Every one of us has seen the closed Walmarts – anyone ever wonder why? If they don't get the result they want, they leave.

    They tried that and it didn't work so they are done. I predict you will see a huge cut in payouts and entry fees that put FLW more inline with the regional and BASS Open-style events. I do not believe the Tour will be touched.

    Keep up the good work, Harold.

  • Dave Thompson of Washington, IL writes:

    RE: Mercury labor – I have owned seven Mercury big blocks in a row and am a strong union man, as is my family.It will be my last. The price of these motors never goes down at retail but they continue to beat on the people that have made them what they are. I have owned my last black motor. I cannot back a company that starves their employees and still charges me the same price on the shelf.

  • Chad Keogh of Black Creek, BC, Canada writes:

    RE: Sharp opinion – Until the greed factor is removed from the tournament organizers, there will be no improvement. I think the best option for this to actually happen is for the PAA to develop into the leading tournament organization.

    BASS/ESPN is all about the dollar. Back when Ray and Harold were running BASS the need for dollars was there, but the love of the sport and doing what's right for the sport came first and it showed.

    FLW is in trouble, but I think they'll pull out of this in good shape. I just wish they'd mix up the tournament schedule and event locations a bit to make it a little more interesting. However, I know this takes work and might mean holding events where the community isn't coughing up a pile of cash to host the event.

    If there was a tournament organization that put the good of the sport before the good of their bank account, then things might get back on track again.

  • Reginald Crews of North Augusta, SC writes:

    RE: Secret jigs – Looks like Secret Lures has done it again! I can't wait to get my hands on these.

  • Joe Blow of Kalamazoo, MI writes:

    Ike should be ranked above all three FLW Tour guys in the Top 10.

  • Bob Milanec of Champaign, IL writes:

    I've been watching some of the comments about what's going on with Mercury Marine. Does anyone really believe that they'll hire more people in Oklahoma? I suspect that they'll expect double duty from the employees there for far less wages, benefits and no representation. Just another way to break union labor.

    Has anyone really looked at what was presented to the workforce? Does upper management take these kinds of reductions in their numbers – cuts in wages and benefits? Someone is also going to have to explain to me how you can lay off the people that build the products that you sell and reduce the number of units built and still pay for all of the upper management salaries and perks. Wake up America!

  • Jeff Lira of Roanoke, VA writes:

    Let's see, Local 1947 president Mark Zillges and his union has decided not to accept any concessions. As a result, Mercury will, more than likely, move, leaving at least 1,800 Fond Du Lac Mercury employees without a job.

    Will the monthly union dues that those employees paid for years be able to cover their house payments, medical costs or food for their children? No.

    Will union president Mark Zillges be out of a job? No. He'll still eat from the fruitful trough of others' work. In the meantime, one of Fond Du Lac's main employers will close as a result of self-serving representation. Talk about "garbage."

    Janesville, Wisc., Detroit, Mich., Rockford, Ill., Fond Du Lac, Wisc. Commonality? Union.

    Perhaps those 1,800 folks who are about to lose their jobs may want to consider ridding themselves of their crippling union, oust Mark Zillges and earn $15.00/hr - it's better than $0.00/hr!

  • Keith Ludwick of Las Vegas, NV writes:

    What's sad about this is the history. For 70 years Mercury was based in Wisconsin. The mercury people are just like everyone else – it's all about the money. So much for honest pay for an honest day's work. Of course they want to move it to a nonunion plant. Nonunion has been proven to be weaker. The mercury heads just want their wallets fatter. Betcha the cost of one of the outboards won't change, even though their labor costs will be less. Maybe they should take it across the border.

  • Ed Walker of Pinson, AL writes:

    Maybe it wasn't such a smart thing in this economy to try and play union hardball with a marine company. The union president should be ashamed at what he has allowed to happen. Are they so far away from Detroit to not see what has happened to jobs in this economy?

  • Karl Zainitzer of Herrin, IL writes:

    The rankings shouldn't been determined until all seasons are complete. There still is Championship week with BASS.

  • Kevin Vida of Clare, MI writes:

    Our thoughts and prayers are with Ricky and his family. Your classic laugh and smile will be missed by all.

  • Martin Danny Lamb of Lumberton, NC writes:

    KVD leads at the end of the season? I didn't know the season was over. Thought there were two more events before the Angler of the Year was settled? Reese has wons AOY and Classic, but KVD is unstoppable? Geesh!!! Reese was leading AOY points for this year until BASS awarded their "special points." I guess Bassfan came up with that system also?

    Why don't you just rename this site KVDfan.com ?

  • George Kramer of Lake Elsinore, CA writes:

    There appears to be some confusion over proper use of certain bass fishing terms – particularly the word "tough," as in tough fishing.

    Fishing in Pittsburgh wasn't tough, it was "crappy," as in: "This is a crappy fishery that has been given special treatment by the EPA guys since the 1960s, but you still can't catch a decent bass."

    Three Rivers is a crappy fishery supported by civic leaders who were willing to spend a lot of money for people to visit their hospitable residents – and their crappy fishery.

    Dardanelle, on the other hand, produced "tough" fishing –meaning tough to get a bite.

    This is an important distinction.

  • Chris Wells of Greer, SC writes:

    Ricky Shumpert was a great fisherman. He will be missed.

  • Jemes Key of Troy, AL writes:

    Rickey Shumpert was a super guy. Lost touch since the EverStart series was changed. I'll surely miss him.

  • Chris Hults of Vancleave, MS writes:

    I won the FLW Stren Series tournament, co-angler side, Texas division, at Lake Amistad. The tournament was in mid-May. As a Ranger boat owner and member of the Ranger Cup, I qualified for the contingency money, which for this event was $5,000. As of this writing, I haven't received the money that I feel I've earned. Ranger has told me that the decision to pay contingency moneys owed rests in the hands of the bankruptcy court and will not say when or if I'll get the money.

    It is extremely unfair and very disappointing that Ranger's paying people who are winning Ranger Cup money after the June 1 filing date, but not the ones, like me, who happened to win money prior to June 1. It seems to me that if they have the money to continue to run tournaments, they should pay the people who've already fished and won. As a longtime Ranger owner, I would have never thought I'd be treated so unfairly.

    If anyone has any thoughts on this matter or could offer some help on how I can get the money I won please let me know. Is there anyone out there going through similar circumstances?

  • Michael McCoy of Mentor, OH (by way of Beaufort, SC) writes:

    Thoughts and prayers go out to Ricky's family. Fished with him and against him, and he'll be sorely missed!

  • Michael Thomas of Highpoint, NC writes:

    You're correct about the Walmart/FLW split. When Lee Scott retired, the "in" for the FLW left, as well as the millions of dollars they had been paying in for sponsorship all those years. Go look around your local Walmart sporting goods aisle. You'll notice that fishing tackle has left the building. It was a good ride for FLW, but the Walmart horse finally gave out and died. Wonder who'll be next to try and fill the money pit?

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    Where are we headed? July 16, 2008, BASS announces the 2009 and 2010 BASS Elite 11-tournament schedules.

    January 9, 2009, just a couple months before the first 2009 Elite, BASS changes everything, cancels three Elite events, rearranges entry fees and announces a two-event Championship for the TTAOY. They also change the scoring and limit it to the Top 12 in TTAOY standings. The points were changed and 2 bonus per win were added to determine the standings for the TTAOY Championship.

    Several anglers endorsed it, which was a surprise as it reduced the amount of money they could fish for and would affect the Classic qualifications with three less events and the Elite field had been set and entry fees had been paid. Canceling three events and creating two more made about as much sense as Town Hall Meetings to solve Health Care Reform, but it gave ESPN/BASS a new TV show to sell and 12 anglers are easier to film than 100, and BASS has a habit of changing in mid-season.

    The decimal move and rounding off with a 50-point sliding scale helped everyone except Reese, Ike and Swindle. KVD moved ahead of Reese on bonus points, Ike and Swindle lost points. Either one win both the events and lose the Championship to Reese or KVD if they place in the Top 5 in both. Jones can also beat them with 77 points. Where would Biffle and Jones be without the penalty from Stone that BASS applied? (What rule covers being penalized because another angler can't handle a boat?).

    Now BASS has announced the 2010 Elite schedule with changes from the original announcement. The 2009 Elite schedule just finished at Oneida, except the Top 12 that qualified for the TTAOY Championship, and the Elite anglers can park their rigs in their driveways until March 2010 – that's 6 months for those that qualified for the Classic in February and 7 months for those not going by Birmingham on their way to California.

    March 2010, you can wipe off the rust and dust on your $50,000 rigs, with $350 rods and reels and $35 lures and try to catch five bass per day for 4 months, then park them on your driveway again. Jeff Foxworthy once said, "If yo' bass boat spends most of the time parked on your driveway, yo' could be a Redneck Pro Angler." This schedule isn't going to sell a lot of boats and tackle.

    Take a look at the BassFan 2009 money listing and you will notice No. 1 listed as $604,512 and No. 38 listed as $60,006. What you will not notice is this list contains BASS Classic 2008 money, which it should not, as several on this list did not qualify or fish the 2008 BASS Classic. If you remove the 2008 BASS Classic money the list will look like this:

    1. $204,018
    31. $50,518.

    The 2009 BASS Elite entry fees are $41,600, add another $1,000 per event for travel cost and the 2009 entry fees and travel cost equal $49,600. This means only 31 BASS Elite anglers won back their entry fees and travel cost. This doesn't mention equipment cost (that will collect rust, dust and payments for 6 months).

    Where are we heading?

    Over at FLW, "The Man With The Plan" is battling bankruptcy court, Wallyworld is bailing out with it's vendor sponsors and the next largest sponsor is being rude about paying what they owe. FLW has joined BASS in the 6 months off and keep it all in the Southeast for 2009 & 2010.
    Before Ray Scott and BASS came along I spend 26 years working on the Southern Railroad, I've seen enough train wrecks to recognize one looking for a place to happen.
    Where are we heading ? The leaders in this sport are not speaking to each other, they schedule events so anglers are limited to events they can fish, the industry is all on shaky ground, the anglers are all cussing each other and the season just last 6 months per year.
    Where are we heading ?

  • Jarrett Broy of West Frankfort, IL writes:

    RE: Jackall Flick Shake – My son and I used green-pumpkin/black-fleck on Kentucky Lake. We caught a total of 152 bass in 1 day!

  • Anthony Brown of Louisburg, NC writes:

    BASS and FLW outdoors need to wake up and realize that fans of fishing don't care about the rivalry between organizations. Both would be better served to consult each other and schedule events throughout the year – not just during primetime. A true championship event between the top pros in each series would also attract more fans and sponsor money – a win-win situation for all.

  • Michael Thomas of Highpoint, NC writes:

    In regard to the fiasco at Dardanelle, it was a Bill Taylor decision to go there during the worst time possible. He really needs help in determining what makes a good schedule. He should let someone like Ron Lappin make the schedule. Wake up FLW: Take a look at the numbers at Dardanelle. That should tell you what a mistake you made.

  • Ed Whitaker of Auburndale, FL writes:

    I'm new to this site, but so far I've found it to be very good. I've just started to get into it.

  • Mark Richards of Houston, TX writes:

    I'm still scratching my head over the BASS ruling to disqualify Bill Lowen's entire catch at Oneida the day he culled from six fish. So Lowen culled the sixth fish the second he knew he had one - isn't that a reasonable reaction? So now, if he brings in his five remaining fish, and BASS culls his biggest one that remains (according to the rules) so that he weighs only 4, how can they say that's not fair under the premise that "we didn't know what his biggest fish actually was." He was actually penalized one fish more than a competitor who had rode around all day with six fish in the well in violation of game laws, and then was naive enough to dump six into his bag then into the box in front of the tournament director. Sorry, in my opinion Trip and BASS blew this ruling.

  • Jon Brown of Las Vegas NV writes:

    Perhaps BassFan needs to go back to 2002 when FLW started attacking BASS with scheduling. Maybe that would show the pattern FLW has had. I love FLW, but when it comes down to it, FLW is the tour constantly scheduling conflicts.

    I highly recommend a re-attack on this one BassFan, and not to stir up old wounds, but to perhaps explain to the anglers out there that both tours need to get along and that's hard when one tour's doing whatever they can to get at the other one.

    Last check, the tournaments or for anglers, not for tours to use the anglers to show another tour up.

  • Dan Isenhart of Fairview, TN writes:

    Why is Fantasy Fishing bad for the sport? Is it taking money from the entry fees? Is it cutting into the event payouts? Is there a reduction in the big-bass pot, or the number of anglers going to the FLW Cup next year?

    The sponsors put up the money, the fans play. What's wrong with that? If I could play fantasy football the same way for Eli Manning's money, I would.

  • Dave Dieling of Elmhurst, IL writes:

    Seems the FLW/Walmart rumors are more than that. I went to register yesterday for a BFL online, and the dropdown no longer reads Walmart Bass Fishing League – just Bass Fishing League. I think most of the Walmart references on the website have been expunged.

  • Derekn Masters of New Castle, IN writes:

    Interesting article. There's a boat in town that must be a '50s fin boat. It's been setting at a used dealership for a few weeks now and I pass it every day and always think, Who would try to build a boat like that? Glad to know it was meant to be built like that.

  • Damon Wooley of Live Oak, TX writes:

    is this the first Classic that Tim Horton has ever missed?

    BassFan says: Yes it is.

  • Joe Foley of Cincinnati, OH writes:

    Hats off to the integrity of Bill Lowen. He could have easily let his culling mistake slide by and make a check. But he didn't and this shows his honest character. Bill, since you're so honest, please share a few spots on the Ohio River with me!

  • Tommy Hagler of Abilene, TX writes:

    I want to send a big congrats to Chad Griffin for his Elite win this weekend. I can only hope he'll get the respect he's been due for a while. I've fished with Chad and he didn't luck out and win that tournament. He's a great fisherman and someone I call a friend. This will give him the confidence to go even stronger next season. A rookie that's "one of us" and went to live a dream and pulled it off. Congrats to Chad!

    Also, Jeff Kriet is one of the nicest men you'd want to share a boat with. I was fortunate to fish an FLW tourney with him and was happy to see him with such a great finish. Two great, down-to-earth guys with awesome finishes. Congrats Jeff. Hope to see you at one of the next shows!

  • Terry Banks of Lexington, SC writes:

    I want to thank BassFan.com for the coverage of the BASS Elite Series tournament on Oneida Lake. If it weren't for you, I wouldn't have day 3 results. ESPN coverage is less than desirable.

  • David Mauldin of Round Rock, TX writes:

    Way to go Chad!

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    Two DQs at the Elite Series at Oneida on day 1. Bill Lowen and Bobby Lane both had their catch DQd on day 1 for having six bass in the well – violations of BASS rule C16 & C6 were reported as rules used to DQ their catch. In Lowen's case, he called the tournament director and reported that he released one bass when he discovered six in the well, so the director DQd the catch as he could not determine his largest bass at that point, as rule C16 states.

    Lane reported to the director that he had done the same after hearing about Lowen's DQ at the weigh-in, so again the director couldn't determine his largest bass at that point.

    Rule C6 was also quoted, stating that if Lowen or Lane had brought in six bass they would be in violation of rule C6 and also New York state rules.

    This puts a tournament director in a spot that I found myself in years ago at a BASS tournament on West Point Lake. Tommy Martin dumped his bass in the check-in basket and discovered he had one too many in the bag. He also discovered that an Alabama game warden was helping out on the check-in and had just counted his fish, which was in violation of Alabama laws.

    The warden said, "I don't know what to do." Tommy said, "You have no choice – everyone is looking at you, write me a ticket", which he did.

    Tommy wasn't DQd because the BASS rule stated, "All competitors are bound by the prevailing statues and regulations of the various states within which they fish".

    Tommy was in violation of state laws and was ticketed for it, but the BASS rule, at that time and still, doesn't mention being DQd. It's kind of like the length limit rule. If the state law is 12 inches, then the BASS rule is 12 inches, but if you mismeasure and bring in a short, you're not DQd for it. You're penalized, but your catch isn't DQd.

    Now, back to having six in the well and culling one. BASS Rule C16 states, "At no time shall a competitor have in his or her possession more than the tournament limit. Tournament officials will conduct checks for violations of this provision, and in the event a competitor has more than the above-described limits in possession, shall cull down to the limit described, beginning with the largest bass first."

    Now the question is when is a bass in your possession? When you boat it or place it in the well? If you have five in the well and boat another one, do you have six in possession? If you place number six in the well while you look for a smaller one to cull, do you have six in possession?

    Our ruling was always that if you have a limit and boat another one you must release one before making another cast. This gave everyone a chance to decide which one to release.

    At the same West Point tournament, another angler was bagging his bass at the weigh-in dock and in full view of everyone pulled out an extra bass and threw it under the dock. He was reported to me and I culled his largest bass which weighed over 8 1/2 lbs.

    These are hard rules to write and enforce because you cannot think of everything that can happen. Lowen and Lane didn't stop to think about it when they discovered the extra bass. They quickly culled one to correct their mistake, then notified the director who could have still culled their largest bass leaving them with only four, or DQd their catch as he did. When a decision has to be made on enforcing rules, it's always must be the tournament director who is responsible to do that. That's why we have rules writen by the director.

  • Heather Shaw of Tinley, IL writes:

    Mr. Storm obviously has some problems getting his information. You say your gripe with the FLW Outdoors 2010 schedule is the fact that they overlapped events with BASS. If you believe that, than you need to look at the facts.

    First, the FLW Outdoors tournament that takes place on the Red River on Feb. 11 - 14 will not interfere with any bass tournaments. The Classic doesn't fish until the 19th. Even if an angler makes the cut for FLW Outdoors, they'll have no problem getting 4 days of practice, and 1 day off before the Classic.

    Second, when BASS announced its original schedule, the Blue Ridge Brawl was set for August 12 - 15. Once FLW Outdoors released there 2010 schedule on 7-29-09, BASS announced on 8-04-09 that they'd be moving there Blue Ridge Brawl to April 15-18 – the same weekend FLW Outdoors has there April 15-18 tournament on Lake Chickamauga.

    With that being said, how can you post FLW Outdoors overlapped BASS, when according to the dates listed above, BASS overlapped FLW Outdoors!

    BassFan says: Thanks for the FeedBack. To clarify, the Bassmaster Classic uses a limited practice format. Next year's official Classic practice is Friday through Sunday, Feb. 12–14 (days 2, 3 and 4 of the Red River FLW Tour). Additionally, no BASS dates were changed when BASS cut its schedule. There was an Amistad event scheduled for April 15–18. BASS kept the date, but changed the venue to Smith Mt. (Blue Ridge Brawl).

  • Jon Brown of Las Vegas, NV writes:

    Grand slam, Storm! Seriously one of the best series I've read in a while on the schedules for both tours. You laid it out clear and concise where both tours have potentially done themselves a disservice.

    I have to agree with you on the stops on both tours. In the defense of the tours, the economy is forcing them to stick with the "knowns," so you can give them both a mulligan there. Although one has to ask why certain stops were left off – the deep Texas swing for BASS and the northern swing for FLW.

    I'm glad to see you address the angst that FLW seems to have toward BASS. I was reading some comments from Jacobs back in 2003, and it seems to me that he feels BASS is past its time and FLW should take its place in the forefront. I am referencing the fall 2003 letter on the 2004 Classic.

    There's no reason to have infighting, as that hurts the anglers. I can't blame BASS, what else do they do? Wait for FLW?

    I don't think either tour's in the position to put a full schedule out. The anglers that can afford it should be able to choose and there are 52 weeks in a year. There's absolutely NO reason that 14 tournaments are right on top of each other. None. I'll say it again. Why hurt the angler?!

    Let the anglers fish both. Then FLW AND BASS will thrive. FLW can still push their boats and have a tour that's the most competitive, as will BASS.

  • Chad Keogh of Black Creek, BC (Canada) writes:

    Let's just hope that Chad Morgenthaler doesn't find as many flaws with their rods as Boyd Duckett did, which caused him to drop them as sponsors.

  • Jon Brown of Las Vegas, NV writes:

    In reference to the guys who somehow think that the tours are rearranging schedules based on the tours' financial states, first, the fees are paid by the anglers. The tour could have a 15-event tour and would get takers. The field would just shrink to the point of affecting the prize payout to the tour going under due to lack of participation.

    I don't understand why people find this hard to grasp. This isn't an FLW vs. BASS deal. It's both tours using their heads to protect their Anglers. They're cutting back to help the guys ranked 30-100 or 50-150. hose guys are the heartbeat of the tour.

    Second, Harold Sharp makes a great point. I don't care if the top guys make a cool Million. Its not in the best interest of the sport when a guy doing nothing makes the same as the guy that toiled, practiced, bought the tackle, bought the gas, fought the weather, traveled, had to spend time away from the family, and the guy that sat in front of the computer wins what he did. Can I get in a fantasy football league that'll pay me what Eli Manning gets paid if my fantasy team wins?

  • Tom Hamilton of Sarasota, FL writes:

    I'd love to hear more about Boyd Duckett's fallout with CarrotStix.

  • Ellis Martin of Tulsa, OK writes:

    Why is viewing comments about conditions, baits to use, location of grass, etc. on Twitter from people not in the tournament not consider "receiving or giving help or information" from a rules standpoint?

    BassFan says: The Internet is largely considered to be publicly available information.

  • Tom Leogrande of Greenbrae, CA writes:

    I think it might be time to add Cody Meyer to the rankings!

    BassFan says: The BassFan World Rankings only incorporate pros who fish the FLW Tour or Bassmaster Elite Series. If Meyer makes the jump up, he'll become ranked.

  • Steve Boyd of Orlando, FL writes:

    Was Jon Storm's column an editorial piece or an opinion because I am missing the objective journalism in his statements. If you are going to report, by all means report and do some research beforehand and please bring some facts. I don't believe "hokey post season" is factual based or unbiased.

    And wondering out loud in an editorial piece is not journalism. We are the ones that may be wondering how venues feel about fewer events and it's your job to contact the venue to give us the information. And if you do happen to accidentally wonder aloud it generally should be followed by a question mark.

    Jon is also implying that the venues are dissatisfied with the schedule without having any facts to base his opinion. That's not journalism!

    Maybe in the future clarifying whether or not something like this is an OP ED piece or an editorial column would be helpful. Of course if this is an op ed piece it means it is the opinion of BassFan which is not unbiased journalism. Either way you guys should be holding yourselves to much higher standards. Tisk, Tisk.

    BassFan says: Sorry for the confusion. As the Opinion page states, "BassFan Opinions are opinion pieces written about issues of the day by all BassFans, including pro anglers and other major players in the sport, weekend warriors and the BassFan staff."

  • Vince Borrego of Phoenix, AZ writes:

    Re; Fishouflage – "...the purpose isn't camouflage, it's a lifestyle statement."

    Maybe they should rethink the marketing communications with the above text. I suppose people are going to be referring to bass fishermen as an "alternative lifestyle" with a message like this. It reminds me of the quote from the TV show Seinfeld, "Not that there's anything wrong with it!"

    We're here, where's my beer, get used to it!

  • Richard Butler of Irvington, KY writes:

    Please explain how FLW justifies how they weigh fish. When they open up the container to put fish in the box full of water, some water's splashed out. In a tournament where a fraction of an ounce separates thousands of dollars, I don't understand their logic in using this weighing procedure. Can someone share some insight?

    The in-water weigh-in system is used by FLW Outdoors on days 3 and 4 of competition – when the field is limited after the cut. The scale is routinely re-zeroed after an angler adds his or her fish. To re-zero the scale, an official removes the insert which holds the fish, zeroes the scale to the weight of the water, then places the insert back in with the fish. In some cases, the scale is zeroed several times for a single pro.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    I just checked the BassFan 2009 money winnings. The combined total for money won on both the FLW and BASS tousr is topped out at $595,606 – only two anglers winning over $500,000 – then it drops over $300,000 and only five anglers have won over $200,000. In fact, only 22 anglers have hit the $100,000 mark so far this year.

    But a guy in the bleachers, with no investment except some free computer time, has won a cool $1,000,000 playing Fantasy Fishing.

    This is double what any angler has won. It's many times what most anglers will ever win. This is unreal – that anglers fishing the pro circuits spend tons on equipment, travel cost, hours on the water away from home and only the Top 20 may finish with a little money while someone with nothing invested except free time makes $1,000,000 from Fantasy Fishing (and he wasn't the only one who cashed in on this sport beside the people that work hard to make it happen). Something's wrong here and it should be corrected. Everyone's making a killing on professional bass fishing except the anglers that made it happen. This isn't right.

  • Charles Sim of Ottawa, ONT (Canada) writes:

    Best of luck to McCaghren on his pursuit of the Classic.

    I have to comment on one of his lessons learned, "....it's not always a good idea to try to conserve fish on the Elite Series..." How true is that. I left some fish day 1 on the FLW on Champlain, and it cost me a Top 10. New policy: Catch 'em all!

    Good luck at Oneida!

  • Mike Williams of Canton, GA writes:

    What kind of watch is Mike Iaconelli wearing? You can't miss his watch – it's big, but cool.

  • Steve Streeter of Monroe, LA writes:

    Charlie Evans and Irwin Jacobs aren't banging their heads against a wall – they're laughing all the way to the bank. They saved $500,000 when Greg Hackney won.

  • Jon Brown of Las Vegas, NV writes:

    My question is this: When BASS is losing Elite Series anglers due to financial difficulties, how are they supposed to keep adding events like its 2007? With all due respect to the top-end guys that have the backing to fish 20 events if the schedule had them, What about the rest of the field? From what I've seen, each angler is worth $500 of the $10,000 paid. So when guys start dropping like flies because they can't stay for financial reasons, something has to give.

    As a fan, right – I'd love there to be a tournament every week until the first week of October. However, that's not possible in an economy with 9.4% unemployment, sponsors cutting back, guys having trouble getting jobs in the off-season, and more. There just isn't enough money to go around. So while the top guys don't suffer, the guys in the bottom do. Whether they should be there or not isn't our call, they qualified so they can be there. The problem is the pool of guys with $60K-plus in the bank to spend on fees and traveling. Add more events and those guys will quit. Then your 20th place drops from $10k to 9.5 to 8. So yeah, the top guys suffer without some big events, but the tour stays viable.

  • Clayton Frye of Bossier City, LA writes:

    Brent Ehrler above Skeet Reese in World Rankings? There's no way! I bet you could take the Top 12 Elite guys and put them in the FLW and 10 out of 12 would be in the Top 12. KVD would be leading that by a landslide. No one can touch KVD, except maybe Reese.

    If Skeet or anyone else does catch KVD it's because the two final tournaments are in Alabama and not up north where they were suppose to be.

    And if you want to see how good the FLW and BASS are, bring them to the Red River in August – not in February when they're bunched up like a bunch of hungry hogs waiting to be slaughtered.

  • Tom Dannewitz of Iron City, AL writes:

    Storm is clueless. Now that the unpleasantries are out of the way, let me explain why. It seems Storm has never heard of a little something called a recession. What that means is the economy is sub-par, meaning businesses need to re-evaluate their operations to fit the waning economy to ensure their survival. BASS is a business. I imagine this is the reason they shortened the season. I can only assume this saves BASS money so there can be an Elite Series, Classic and AOY or whatever next year. Please think things through before you spew useless dribble.

    P.S. What's wrong with having a lot of tournaments in the South? Sure you've got Clear Lake, the Delta and those other West Coast lakes, but isn't the best bass fishing in the Southeast?

  • Al Perry of Lafayette, LA writes:

    That AOY new idea stinks. A guy could lead the pack all year long and be ahead by a mile and then finish 12th in the tournament and get nothing but a big disappointment.

  • Scott Wall of Millbrook, AL writes:

    It's interesting to see the different takes in reference to the leagues cutting their schedules. The one I like the most are the people who defend either group for doing it due to the "current economic situation" facing our country. This is the most laughable excuse to me because it perpetuates a feeling that as long as you're doing bad it's okay for you to justify cutting back. No, this is not okay. A company the size of ESPN should be able to project well into the future what their budgets are going to be, roughly, and plan accordingly. For goodness sakes they have an entire floor of people in New York who do nothing but tell other departments how much revenue they need to make, and are going to make (a little personal experience on this one).

    For people to dismiss a "professional" league with the clout of ESPN as merely cutting costs is a slap in the face. If you made a commitment to the pros and the fans, then follow through on it. This is one of the reasons why our country is in such sad shape. People not following up on their word and ESPN is the leader at it. Ask anyone who did not drink the Kool-Aid.

    *Kool-Aid is a registered trademark of General Foods.

  • John Astrello of Chandler, TX writes:

    This has been coming for a while. I realized several years ago that when I go into the Walmart Fishing section, most of them are very small, and the selection is also. I live in East Texas, and this is obviously a hotspot for fishing.

    That, and when I lived in the Carolinas, I noticed the same thing. Even Walmarts that were very close to major fishing venues had a small/scaled-back selection.

    Without Walmart money FLW may have a difficult time funding all that they do.

  • Ellis Martin of Tulsa, OK writes:

    I'm now convinced the BassFan rankings mean very little. I don't really care how someone fished back in 2007 – no way any logical thinker would agree Reese (Classic champ and in a tie for AOY) drops. What a joke, but hey, it's your website and rules.

  • Joe Kastner of Leesville SC writes:

    Brent Ehrler No. 2 and Luke Clausen No. 6 in the world!?!?! How much is FLW paying you to make up these rankings? How do you, the media, expect to legitimize the sport and build a foundation to grow on with such blatant political influence?

  • David Carter of Greenfield, IN writes:

    Will Mr. Hackney be in one Ranger, or two?

  • Chris Pope of Pensacola, FL writes:

    ""Plain and simple" – Your big quote pretty much sums up your writing style. I didn't realize you could become editor in chief by just BASS bashing? "Hokey post season"? If you want to call some of the sport's greatest of all time hokey, I think KVD, Skeet, Ike and Jones, just to name a few, would disagree. Thirteenth through 100th in the AOY numerical don't have a shot an way. With the new coverage of the post-season the AOY will be the focus – not just another tournament where the AOY gets lost in the crowd.

    The schedule has nine different venues. That's a lot of juggling for a pro who starts his season with the Classic at the end of February. Also take into consideration overlapping of the schedule with two events in March, two in April, three in May, and two In June. That's nine tournaments in a 5-month period. Perhaps you must have missed the poll taken among the Elite anglers when the majority of veteran anglers prefer having the schedule stacked and not strung out. This really makes sense when you look at the mileage to event times/days ratio.

    But that would mean that you might have to put some thought into it, instead of your typical knee-jerk reaction.

    As far as the TV issue lets compare viewing numbers. FLW isn't even in the same ballpark (if you could even find them the past 3 or 4 years). I failed to comment on all of the afore mentioned FLW anglers. Nixon, Yelas, Fritts and the Hibdons wouldn't even have a career if not for BASS. Not to whip a dead horse, with the exception of Nixon, all the guys you mentioned got spanked at the cup by the BASS sticks to the tune of over 600k. That's almost enough to help get Genmar back on the right track.

    You spoke about twenty years from now, how no doubt an asterisk would be by the AOY. With your total negativity I don't give you 20 months much less 20 years till you have an asterisk by your name in the unemployment line. Why? Because you definitely have your head up your asterisk.

  • Nate Murray of Fulton, NY writes:

    I'm not sure how setting a limit on motor size (horsepower) would help out the struggling boat and motor market.

  • Michael Thomas of Highpoint, NC writes:

    Evans and the others may have saved $500K, but the Tour guys are POed that the money went to someone that never went to a Tour event this year. For the entry fee they paid as opposed to the real Tour anglers they really cashed in without having to pay the price. It's a real bad idea to mix apples and oranges because the guys paying the big entry fees take it on the chin every time. I guess that also settles Evans' issue about a BASS vs. FLW World Series. Bass just won. Wow, what would have happened if the BFL guy that only paid $500 in entry fees had won. What a stink.

  • Chris Wag of Bayou Gauche, LA writes:

    I don't mind the 12-man postseason except for the idea of dropping the last digit in the points. If an angler builds an insurmountable lead throughout the regular season, he should be able to enjoy the cushion in the postseason. If he mounts a 400-point lead after the regular season, he should walk away with the title. He's worked hard for it. Instead, he's now 40 points up and, although it's a good lead, he can be caught.

  • Doug Amos of Mallorytown, ONT (Canada) writes:

    Jon is 100% right on! Are both the tours trying to alienate the entire Northeast, and did they forget that Florida has some pretty good fishing in the winter and spring? The sponsors are missing out on a huge portion of the market.

  • Scott Groff of Omaha, NE writes:

    RE; Slate article – That's the best thing I've read about tournament fishing since Bass Wars.

  • Kevin Mills of Chesapeake, VA writes:

    Jon Storm hits the nail on the head! I'm aware of the financial state of the union. I understand the need to shorten a season. I can even buy off on reduced fees (not like I pay them). I follow BASS because of the caliber of talent. learn from the tour. However, BASS's decision for a post-season is ludicrous. My son approached me about the new "direction." He questioned its validity. Game over.

    Does it always have to be about the dollar? I thought it was about love for the sport? The preservation of a natural resource and a way of life for so many Americans. BASS has brought us far - better weigh-in procedures, vastly improved fish-care and, need I say, live release, to name a few. We are not the NFL, NBA or NHRA. We are fishermen trying to preserve our way. Don't belittle our passion by bowing to corporate pressure.

  • David Sicheneder of Forest Lake, MN writes:

    Totally agree. It's cool when they have to go somewhere different or new. It's nice to see them come in somewhat blind like the Mississippi River this year. I also like the spreading out of the schedule to see all the seasons and it's even more exciting to watch them during the summer and in events that aren't whackfests. Yawn.

    Prespawn, spawn and post-spawn – that's three seasons, right? Wrong.

  • Keith Bardolf of Kabul, AFG writes:

    Short of a "Bass Fishing Bailout" being issued by the U.S. Government, I'm not so sure what Mr. Storm would propose that the major organizations do to stay viable. Maybe if he had proposed some ideas or alternative courses of action it would have made his rant a bit more valid.

    A month or so ago it was uncertain if Ranger would even be able to honor its current obligations in reference to FLW payouts. How much more uncertain of a business environment does he think is needed to warrant operational changes? That having been said, it's not this to which I take particular umbrage.

    By demeaning and devaluing the personal accomplishments of the eventual 2009/2010 BASS AOYs, he's doing a complete disservice to those individuals who'll have done nothing more or less than won the title by the system and rules in place. Very unfortunate.

    Like the saying goes, "Don't hate the player – hate the game."

  • Ben Ballou of Lafayette, TN writes:

    I can understand what you're getting at, but in no way should these years have an asterisk beside them. How many times in the modern era of fishing has a guy came from 13th place or worse to win the title? You forget that these 12 anglers are the best 12 of 2009 – that can't be overlooked. With that being said, I'll completely agree that it was better when they started in January or February and fished all over the country till they got up north in September. It allows the most versatile angler to win and that's what AOY is about.

  • Mark Detweiler of Orlando, FL writes:

    These guys make their living fishing tournaments and a short schedule is a joke. They get paid by their sponsors to promote tackle and to fish. They need to go to 11 regular and then a post-season. The pros want to make money doing their job, not sit at home. That's why they're pros.

  • John Bernard of Pittsburgh, PA writes:

    I think your article pretty much hits it right on the head. As a longtime BASS member, I'm very disappointed in the way this is going, especially with the marshal program. I think it's a total joke and a slap in the face to all members who look at these pros as idols. To take the oppotnity away to fish with these pros is a total slap in the face. They're worried about a co-angler catching a few fish out of the back of there boat? Grow up! You were in our position once.

    I'm really leaning toward fishing FLW because you can still fish with the pros. As far as the schedule goes, I'd like to see them fish one event on the TVA lakes and go to places that are difficult to fish such as the Ohio river. Anyone can get to a lake when they're spawning and catch them. I'd to see them be challenged. They go to the best lakes at primetime strictly for TV. It's not right.

  • Jerry Glenn of Clover, SC writes:

    Your story said Greg Hackney used 1/16- and 1/8-ounce baits to catch his fish at the Cup. I wonder if he used spinning gear or baitcasting. The picture of him looked like it was a baitcaster. If a baitcaster, that's the reason he's a pro. Either that or he has a lot better gear than me. Congratulations to Greg.

    BassFan says: He used both, depending on the lure weight.

  • Robert Allen of Calhoun, GA writes:

    That sound you heard was Charlie Evans and Irwin Jacobs slamming their heads against the wall after two Elite Series anglers who never fished a single FLW Tour this year event finish 1-2 in Pittsburgh. The Shakyhead Tour got beat at its own game.

  • Tom Stallings of Louisville, KY writes:

    Since the tours seemingly must have consolidated schedules, why not rotate the times of the year? This year spring (which really proves little in skills), then next to summer only, then the following year to a fall and winter schedule (that doesn't include south Texas or Florida). The public fishes year-round, why shouldn't the tours?

  • Martin Sexton of St. Paul, MN writes:

    Probably one of the best BassFan Opinions I've ever read. Before I opened it, I thought it would be about BASS putting an event on top of the FLW Chickamauga event, keeping pros from fishing both tours. It's great stuff and brings up some excellent questions. Hopefully BASS listens.

  • Brent Story of Atlanta, GA writes:

    Speaking of a yawn, here we go again with some BASS-FLW BS.

    First off, BASS is still fishing eight regular events and FLW is fishing six. More importantly, you must be in some economic bubble the rest of us aren't because last time I checked everyone had to cut back to survive. How do you expect FLW to expand their schedule when their parent company's going through bankruptcy?

    I guess you're just stirring the pot here but I think it's irresponsible in these economic times to jump on either league. Both are trying to cut back in order to survive and keep the anglers' logistical costs to a minimum. For that I thank both FLW and BASS and am just glad both are still around. If it means more events in one area for a little while until the economy recovers, so be it.

  • John Hunter of Houston, TX writes:

    Right on! I couldn't agree more. You touched on it, and that is, What will the sponsors think about less market exposure? It doesn't sit well here. What are you folks going to write about during all those down months? As a consumer I feel cheated! I guess we're in for a lot of reruns. I'm still wondering how many 1-pound fish they'll have to show on camera to equal the effect of one double-digit fish from Falcon or Amistad!

  • Tom Anderson of Cambridge Springs, PA writes:

    The tours have abandoned better than half the country's fishing community with their "Southern Tours." Not to mention putting the additional disadvantage to the northern anglers competing on the tour. They have to travel for every event. Nothing close to home to give them a financial break. To be named the best, you should compete on a diversity of waters throughout the year and compete from prespawn through the summer patterns. Events should be held on reservoirs, river systems and natural lakes to provide a true test to the anglers' skills. It's a shame that those regions with some of the finest fishing opportunities in the country will not get to showcase them to the world.

  • John Murray of Phoenix, AZ writes:

    Jon, I fully agree about the scheduling of the BASS Elite Series tour. The dropping of Amistad, Erie and Champlain tournaments just sounds wrong. Please, please, somebody – BASS, FLW, PAA – schedule a big-money northern tour (Detroit, Buffalo, Thousand Islands, Champlain) for next summer so we can fish at least half a year!

    BassFan says: John Murray is an Elite Series pro.

  • Steve Boyd of Orlando, FL writes:

    Can we get another picture for Jon Storm? He looks like Edgar from Men in Black. The "Edgar Suit" version!

  • Alex Kile of Charleston, IL writes:

    When will the PAA be able to run a true professional circuit? In my opinion, there's maybe only 100 true bass pros between both organizations. All the other anglers just fill the field.

  • Lawrence Mooneyham of Yuma, AZ writes:

    I joined BASS in 1969. I quit BASS when ESPN bought it. Why did anyone think it would work?

  • Jon Brown of Las Vegas, NV writes:

    I like the read on the tour schedules. I'd like to read part 2 on the FLW before commenting. But part of me likes the fact that BASS is going to promote the sport and get the general public into it. Then I agree with you that it's getting a bit watered down.

    I can't blame BASS for thinking ahead and moving the trail closer. It saves the anglers and the trail from potential doom and keeps it in a market that loves it. You can't take a risk when the public doesn't have the funds to support it.

    Lastly, I do disagree with your comments on the 12-man playoff – unless of course there's a chance that No. 13 has a legitimate chance of winning the thing.

    It's like the NASCAR chase. I'd like to see it play out. Except there isn't a full field to potentially skew the results. It pits angler against the fish and conditions. I think that's a refreshing twist and I'm looking forward to it.

    Now, I would like to see more events on the Schedule. Eight just isn't enough.

  • Nathan Smith of Asheville, NC writes:

    I agree with the lack of spreading things out over the season. I'm also tired of seeing the same lakes and bodies of water every year. There are more lakes than just Amistad and Kentucky Lake. I liked how BASS and FLW have held events in Pittsburg to challenge these anglers to adapt to tough conditions and not let them cherrypick 12-pound bass on Falcon Lake in springtime. Another thing: Bring back the Majors like they had a few yeas ago. I hope they get things together if or when the economy gets better.

  • Chad Keogh of Black Creek, BC (Canada) writes:

    Re: Storm opinion – I understand Jon's concern that BASS's AOY cChase idea is more a chase for TV ratings than to elevate or streamline the AOY race.

    I can't help thinking that it's really a good move in that guys who don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of winning the AOY can take the rest of the year to work on their seminars/guiding/open tournaments/etc. As you pointed out, with a reduced field in the current format, it will be very easy to assign a cameraman to each competitor and get excellent TV coverage of the event.

    So as I see it, the pluses are that you get better coverage and that only the guys who actually have a shot are in the event, freeing up those who don't to move on to their other money-generating ventures and try to requalify for the Elite Series.

    The cons are that those who don't have a legitimate shot at the AOY title HAVE to go do other things to occupy their time and generate income.

    Just like qualifying for the Classic, only those with a certain rank in the AOY points standings get in. I see no difference.

  • Perry Matherne of Galliano, LA writes:

    Hey Greg Hackney: Way to show them how a Louisiana man does it. You deserved it!

  • David Gregg of Haslet, TX writes:

    This was all a big scam from the very beginning. I won money also over a number of years and was told by BASS that I would get quite a sum at retirement, but now they tell me no deal, no money, so all the membership fees I put in are all gone. Just as I expected when it came time to pay. I've protested but they will not even respond back.

  • Keith Ludwick of Las Vegas, NV writes:

    I think it's awesome that two Elite Series pros can get 1st and 2nd place in an FLW event. Goes to show you why they're the best of the best under the toughest conditions. My congrats to Greg Hackney and Mike Iaconelli.

  • Bobby Colson of Mt. Juliet, TN writes:

    Wonder if Hackney will get more airtime than he did with the Fishoff win that qualified him for the Cup?

  • Robert Vogelsang of Jessup, MD writes:

    A total of 155 anglers fished the FLW Tour this season. They put up about $26,000 plus expenses for the right to fish this trail. When the results of the championship were decided, the Top 2finishers were not competitors on the FLW Tour. Simply put, Mike and Greg should not have been in this event.

    No other professional sport allows outsiders in their championship events. All the anglers who fish the tour, who put their financial and competitive lives on the line, are the only anglers who should be in this field. They deserve much more respect from the FLW Tour, and maybe this result will finally urge them to demand this respect.

    BassFan says: Remember that the FLW Tour Championship used to be just that – a championship for the FLW Tour only. But it changed to the Forrest Wood Cup, with a Bassmaster Classic-like qualifying system. The new format was announced in late 2005, when FLW created its Series in part to provide a home for BASS pros who opted out of the Elite Series. That was also around the time of the TBF/Federation Nation split. The new Cup format (which officially began in 2007) gave legs to the fledgling Series, as well as the TBF, whose members still wanted a shot at a championship.

  • Jeff Parker of St. Louis, MO writes:

    Hackney just lost a half million dollars - wonder if Triton has paid him that much over the past few years he's been using one. Ranger is probably happy though - they just made $500K.

  • Jim Settnek of Trafford, PA writes:

    Justice was served when Hackney won the Cup. His monster day 2 bag is tough even for us locals to get, so I was sad to see such a great day's work lost when the weights went to zero. I never did like that zero-weight after 2 days rule. Hack-Attack definitely earned his win.

  • Harold Sharp of Hixson, TN writes:

    Here's a tip for Larry Nixon or anyone measuring short bass. For all the years that I was at BASS, we instructed all workers on the check-in line that they could not cull a short bass – they must call the Tournament Director if they have a short one and he must make the decision to cull it. Early on a game-and-fish warden had shown me a trick on how to measure a bass. He said always cover its eye and it'll relax, so each time I had to measure a short one I'd cover the eye as it was laid on its side to be measured and it would relax and measure 90% of the time.

  • Harry Moore of Valley, AL writes:

    Where does BASS stand with the retirement program? Up until the 2009 season, we were required to pay a $100 membership fee each year in order to fish BASS events. We were told last July that we were no longer required to pay this to fish and would be receiving a letter explaining why. Some of our friends have received some information early in January and February of this year but others including myself who have won money haven't gotten any information. Does BassFan know what's going on with the professional dues?

  • Scott Putnam of Brainard, NY writes:

    It's looking like an Elite angler is going to run away with the second-biggest event in bass fishing.

  • Wes Hood of Annandale, VA writes:

    Re: Cup – Four Elite Series anglers in The Cup – 1st, 8th, 20th and 21st after the first 2 days. 'Nuff said.

All Topics   August 2009

Latest News

  • All 4 Kissimmee Chain Lakes Should Play

    All 4 Kissimmee Chain Lakes Should Play

    By MLF Communications Staff

    KISSIMMEE, Fla. – One lucky angler is going to catch one bass on the Kissimmee Chain of Lakes next week and walk away $100,000

  • Race Was Never A Roadblock For Williams

    Race Was Never A Roadblock For Williams

    By Charity Muehlenweg MLF Communications

    It’s early summer 1953, and Saturdays can’t come fast enough for Alfred Williams. Every Saturday morning, 6-year-old

  • Walters Slams The Door With Giant Bag

    Walters Slams The Door With Giant Bag

    By B.A.S.S. Communications Staff

    PROSPERITY, S.C. — Despite the gloomy weather, Monday brought bright prospects for Patrick Walters, who leveraged the

-->

Video You May Like